A small band of FANATICS...
http://www.madeleinefoundation.org.uk/home.htm
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id401.html
"CARTER-RUCK's COSTS
I have raised the question of costs with Carter-Ruck, given the following statement by Dr Kate McCann in her book, 'madeleine'. On page 287 of that book, she wrote: "Adam Tudor and his colleague Isabel Hudson continue to do a vast amount of work for us, without payment, most of it quietly, behind the scenes". LOL!!!!! WHO would EVER believe THAT?!"Not so in my case, it seems. By way of response, Carter-Ruck have clarified the position so far as claiming costs against me is concerned. This is what they have said:
"In relation to your queries about our clients' costs, we entered into as fee-paying retainer with our clients in relation to this Contempt of Court application. As previously indicated ,our clients intend (as they are entitled) to seek an Order for the repayment of their costs by you in the event that their application is successful".
I think I have previously indicated that the McCanns claim I have breached the undertaking I gave the High Court in November 2009 in 149 instances, once by selling a book to Mike Gunnill, and on 148 other occasions by words I have used in postings, articles and leaflets published between January 2010 and August 2011.
SURPRISING CLAIMS OF LIBEL
There are not a few surprising claims of alleged libel.
Alleged breach of undertaking number 148 is described as "The 48 Questions video recording created by and featuring the Defendant". When this was brought to our attention by Carter-Ruck in August, we decided to voluntarily remove that video from YouTube, despite the fact that we could not see how a mere recital of those 48 questions could possibly constitute libel when they consist of a list of questions made public by the Portuguese Police, and are still available to read on the BBC website, and have been published in numerous British and Portuguese newspapers and elsewhere on the internet."
Now check the sanity level of this sheetroll!:
Thursday 02 February 2012
Retired lawyer faces jail for 'harassing' Kate and Gerry McCann
A retired lawyer who has repeatedly accused Kate and Gerry McCann of covering up their daughter Madeleine's death is facing jail for harassment.
8:20AM GMT 29 Jan 2012
For almost five years, Kate and Gerry McCann have suffered the anguish of not knowing what happened to their daughter Madeleine.
Through it all, they have also had to contend with a sustained campaign of harassment conducted by a small band of fanatics convinced they had a hand in their daughter's disappearance.
Now, one of their main tormentors is facing jail for refusing to leave the McCanns' alone.
Tony Bennett has waged a campaign since 2007 against the couple – repeatedly accusing them of covering up the girl's death in leaflets, books and on internet postings.
On one occasion, the Madeleine Foundation, which he runs, handed out 1,500 pamphlets in Rothley, the couple's home village in Leicestershire, entitled "10 key reasons which suggest she was not abducted."
Another booklet has been posted by registered delivery to the McCanns' home.
Next month, a court will decide whether to jail Mr Bennett, 64, for contempt of court.
The action is being brought by Mr and Mrs McCann who have grown increasingly disturbed by Mr Bennett's attacks on them.
Mr Bennett is accused of flouting an agreement in the High Court – made in November 2009 – that he would stop repeating allegations that the McCanns were in some way involved in their daughter's abduction.
Since then, Mr Bennett, a grandfather-of-two from Harlow in Essex, who is obsessed with the case, has posted on the subject of Madeleine McCann's disappearance an astonishing 3,800 times on one website alone.
Lawyers acting for the McCanns accuse him of breaching the undertaking on at least 149 occasions. The list of alleged breaches is not exhaustive.
The McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: "This has gone on for a long time and Kate and Gerry now feel enough is enough. It is obviously very distressing for them. The fact they are taking legal action speaks for itself.
"Tony Bennett is his own worst enemy by persistently doing what he does, he has brought this action on himself."
The couple, both doctors, live in hope their daughter may still be alive and continue the search for her.
A Metropolitan police review of the evidence, put together by Portuguese detectives, continues but is not thought to have produced any significant new leads in the search for Madeleine.
A draft order seen by The Sunday Telegraph, which a judge is expected to rule upon at a hearing in February, includes an option for Mr Bennett to be "committed to HM Prison for a period" to be determined.
Mr Bennett could also be fined and ordered to pay costs that are likely to bankrupt him.
The undertaking Mr Bennett signed – he will now claim he only agreed it under duress – prevents him from making a number of claims in relation to Madeleine's disappearance from her parents' holiday apartment in the Portuguese resort of Praia da Luz on May 3rd 2007.
At the time she was just three-year-old.
The agreement signed in court states: "The defendant [Mr Bennett] undertakes not to repeat allegations that the claimants are guilty of, or are to be suspected of, causing the death of their daughter Madeleine McCann; and/ or of disposing of her body and/ or of lying about what happened and/ or of seeking to cover up what they had done."
The undertaking also included the destruction of a book "What really happened to Madeleine McCann? 60 key reasons which suggest that she was not abducted" and a leaflet "What really happened to Madeleine McCann? 10 key reasons which suggest that she was not abducted."
But since that November 2009 undertaking, Mr Bennett has continued many of his activities.
The list of 149 alleged breaches, compiled by the McCanns' lawyers Carter Ruck, includes a book: "The Madeleine McCann Case Files: Volume 1" and a series of postings on the social networking website Twitter.
Mr Bennett runs the Madeleine Foundation, whose website has been subject to scrutiny by the McCanns' legal team, while also putting up 3,800 posts on another website The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann at a rate of about five a day.
Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Bennett was largely unrepentant and seemingly happy to repeat some of the allegations that put him under threat of contempt.
He first became interested in the case while watching it unfold on television in 2007.
He attempted to bring a private prosecution against the couple in November 2007 for child neglect – on the grounds the couple were eating dinner with friends when Madeleine was abducted – but the case was thrown out in a magistrates' court.
Mr Bennett said: "I have done my best to comply with the undertaking but I would argue to the courts it was an unreasonably wide undertaking to sign.
"In the last two years I have not written specifically about the details of how she [Madeleine] might have died or how the body was hidden.
"It is my sincere conviction that one day I will be proved right. I truly believe that one day the truth will be told. And yes I am risking a breach of the order by saying that."
Asked how he felt about harassing a couple, grieving over the disappearance of their daughter, Mr Bennett replied: "The thing that came closest to harassment was when we distributed the '10 reasons' leaflet in Leicestershire in August 2009.
"Three of my colleagues in the Madeleine Foundation distributed a small quantity of leaflets in Rothley. I would honestly say that perhaps that was a leaflet distribution too far.
"If Madeleine was abducted I would accept what I have done is a wicked campaign of harassment. If I am wrong I am evil. But if I am right, I am a victim of simply having the desire to pursue the truth."
Now, Tony, Good Luck and deep down I am confident for you about this only available choice for you as representing yourself. I feel nobody else could! So what could be seen as a 'downside' is in my eyes a positive point for you!
-"In passing", I find this part of the British justice system completely deprived of... justice itself!! So if any MORON decides to sue you but your savings are over £8000 then you HAVE to hire a barrister... and how expensive are these people!... it's monstrous, but in your case the GOOD thing is that you are perfectly capable of defending anyone - including of course Yourself! So En Avant! and don't forget the windows and the shutters ;)
And, let's have a closer look at this witch-hunting "article" in the main UK press. Oh, it's written by a "CHIEF reporter"... an ironical laugh is sprouting out of me now. Some people have it real good these days. Nearly 3 millions job seekers in GB, most of whom are rightly qualified or even highly skilled, yet we still see privileged persons of this sort who can't even put their abilities (?) to good use. Mr Robert Mendick, where do you show in this article that you are adequately skilled and trained to WRITE for a main press newspaper?
Let's dissect "this":
"For almost five years, Kate and Gerry McCann have suffered the anguish of not knowing what happened to their daughter Madeleine."
NOT KNOWING? Where's YOUR EVIDENCE, Mr Mendick, to state THIS? Mr Mendick, you don't know else than I or any Joe Public know. As far as WE are concerned, WE don't know WHO knows WHAT.
"Another booklet has been posted by registered delivery to the McCanns' home." Mmh... but you don't say WHO has posted it! -yet apparently you do hint that the MF did it! Booooh. (or did you not mean GUNNILL and his deceitful ways to pass himself as a "reseacher" to obtain the very copy of the booklet IN ORDER TO provide the McCanns with some "substance" to sue Mr Bennett?! - see Madeleine Foundation site for details - it seems that this 'coincidence' is now understood by all.)
Next month, a court will decide whether to jail Mr Bennett, 64, for contempt of court. "
Or whether to jail OTHERS perhaps? Oooh, then what would YOU write in The Telegraph? Because the CRUCIAL POINT that you omit here, is HOW do the MCCANN PAY FOR ALL HIS CHARADE courts-festival??? - Isn't it time a JUDGE would revise this FUND they use, that is initially made for their DAUGHTER MADDY, but is also stated to be helping them in LEGAL COSTS... to which extent? Legal costs for what? To sue anyone who doesn't believe them and publicly expresses themselves about it? Do all donators agree with this?
Does everybody also BELIEVE what Mrs Healy in the Kate McCann nom de plume wrote in her "madeleine book" about these legal people working for her for free?! Come on. WE have never seen this fund fully investigated. Yet THEY have fully investigated The Madeleine Foundation's accounts - but, AH, found nothing but good, healthy, honest and transparent results. I truly wonder, would it be the same for "The FIGHTING Fund"? *see www.findmadeleine.com
"The action is being brought by Mr and Mrs McCann who have grown increasingly disturbed by Mr Bennett's attacks on them."
WHY? WHAT HURTS? (re the old phrase "truth hurts"?)
Why would a "small band of fanatics" hurt grieving parents more than the source-event itself?
---Alert! Yesterday I have lost my purse in the local supermarket. It revealed, a pickpocket had it. This has truly hurt! I SO sympathise with Gerry and his 'lost wallet'. But SO many People then gave to the fund afterwards! They were all so generous. As Gerry says: "Most people are inherantly good."
"Mr Bennett is accused of flouting an agreement in the High Court – made in November 2009 – that he would stop repeating allegations that the McCanns were in some way involved in their daughter's abduction. " Well his local brief stated that this "agreement" was far too unrealistic - but Tony felt he had to comply with it - who can really ignore actions like 'mafia style' guys delivering big boxes in a Limo as not a threat?
"Since then, Mr Bennett, a grandfather-of-two from Harlow in Essex, who is obsessed with the case," [And YOU're NOT?] "has posted on the subject of Madeleine McCann's disappearance an astonishing 3,800 times on one website alone." Yeah so what that's 5 posts a day, Mr Bennett always has lots of replies to answer, beside, he is free to use his retired time as he wishes - or do I perceive an ounce of jealousy here? Tony's free to reply on Forums, with his FREE TIME, he's not stuck like SOME are on a newsdesk all day... And visibly, his activities are far more passionating than THAT!
Lawyers acting for the McCanns accuse him of breaching the undertaking on at least 149 occasions. The list of alleged breaches is not exhaustive." BUT ARE VOID I'd say.
"The McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: "This has gone on for a long time and Kate and Gerry now feel enough is enough." YEAH MCCANNS: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!! "It is obviously very distressing for them. The fact they are taking legal action speaks for itself. "LOL, an old habit...
"Tony Bennett is his own worst enemy by persistently doing what he does, he has brought this action on himself."
The McCanns are their worse enemies by persistently doing what they do, and by doing what they DID, THEY have brought this action on themselves. Mmh, sounds right, no? Better than the first version.
"The couple, both doctors, live in hope their daughter may still be alive and continue the search for her."
The couple, one doctor the other one a "dropout", live in great comfort and are extremely busy attending lots of courts to which they now excel at and continue to do so, despite the search for their 'missing' daughter should be the most urgent act they should commit to, but as it is well known they have NEVER taken part in any consistent physical search, and use the publicly funded money reserve to hire incompetent private detectives, and have refused to help the investigation by not providing important documents paramount to the SEARCH FOR THEIR daughter, such as Madeleine McCann's HEALTH RECORDS.
May the Judge represent True JUSTICE at all times.
From: The Lost Marketing Ploy Blog - dedicated to the Truth.
UPDATE: click on http://losingmarketingploy.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/hearing-mccanns-vs-bennett/
Next month, a court will decide whether to jail Mr Bennett, 64, for contempt of court.
The action is being brought by Mr and Mrs McCann who have grown increasingly disturbed by Mr Bennett's attacks on them.
Mr Bennett is accused of flouting an agreement in the High Court – made in November 2009 – that he would stop repeating allegations that the McCanns were in some way involved in their daughter's abduction.
Since then, Mr Bennett, a grandfather-of-two from Harlow in Essex, who is obsessed with the case, has posted on the subject of Madeleine McCann's disappearance an astonishing 3,800 times on one website alone.
Lawyers acting for the McCanns accuse him of breaching the undertaking on at least 149 occasions. The list of alleged breaches is not exhaustive.
The McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: "This has gone on for a long time and Kate and Gerry now feel enough is enough. It is obviously very distressing for them. The fact they are taking legal action speaks for itself.
"Tony Bennett is his own worst enemy by persistently doing what he does, he has brought this action on himself."
The couple, both doctors, live in hope their daughter may still be alive and continue the search for her.
A Metropolitan police review of the evidence, put together by Portuguese detectives, continues but is not thought to have produced any significant new leads in the search for Madeleine.
A draft order seen by The Sunday Telegraph, which a judge is expected to rule upon at a hearing in February, includes an option for Mr Bennett to be "committed to HM Prison for a period" to be determined.
Mr Bennett could also be fined and ordered to pay costs that are likely to bankrupt him.
The undertaking Mr Bennett signed – he will now claim he only agreed it under duress – prevents him from making a number of claims in relation to Madeleine's disappearance from her parents' holiday apartment in the Portuguese resort of Praia da Luz on May 3rd 2007.
At the time she was just three-year-old.
The agreement signed in court states: "The defendant [Mr Bennett] undertakes not to repeat allegations that the claimants are guilty of, or are to be suspected of, causing the death of their daughter Madeleine McCann; and/ or of disposing of her body and/ or of lying about what happened and/ or of seeking to cover up what they had done."
The undertaking also included the destruction of a book "What really happened to Madeleine McCann? 60 key reasons which suggest that she was not abducted" and a leaflet "What really happened to Madeleine McCann? 10 key reasons which suggest that she was not abducted."
But since that November 2009 undertaking, Mr Bennett has continued many of his activities.
The list of 149 alleged breaches, compiled by the McCanns' lawyers Carter Ruck, includes a book: "The Madeleine McCann Case Files: Volume 1" and a series of postings on the social networking website Twitter.
Mr Bennett runs the Madeleine Foundation, whose website has been subject to scrutiny by the McCanns' legal team, while also putting up 3,800 posts on another website The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann at a rate of about five a day.
Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Bennett was largely unrepentant and seemingly happy to repeat some of the allegations that put him under threat of contempt.
He first became interested in the case while watching it unfold on television in 2007.
He attempted to bring a private prosecution against the couple in November 2007 for child neglect – on the grounds the couple were eating dinner with friends when Madeleine was abducted – but the case was thrown out in a magistrates' court.
Mr Bennett said: "I have done my best to comply with the undertaking but I would argue to the courts it was an unreasonably wide undertaking to sign.
"In the last two years I have not written specifically about the details of how she [Madeleine] might have died or how the body was hidden.
"It is my sincere conviction that one day I will be proved right. I truly believe that one day the truth will be told. And yes I am risking a breach of the order by saying that."
Asked how he felt about harassing a couple, grieving over the disappearance of their daughter, Mr Bennett replied: "The thing that came closest to harassment was when we distributed the '10 reasons' leaflet in Leicestershire in August 2009.
"Three of my colleagues in the Madeleine Foundation distributed a small quantity of leaflets in Rothley. I would honestly say that perhaps that was a leaflet distribution too far.
"If Madeleine was abducted I would accept what I have done is a wicked campaign of harassment. If I am wrong I am evil. But if I am right, I am a victim of simply having the desire to pursue the truth."
~~~
Now, Tony, Good Luck and deep down I am confident for you about this only available choice for you as representing yourself. I feel nobody else could! So what could be seen as a 'downside' is in my eyes a positive point for you!
-"In passing", I find this part of the British justice system completely deprived of... justice itself!! So if any MORON decides to sue you but your savings are over £8000 then you HAVE to hire a barrister... and how expensive are these people!... it's monstrous, but in your case the GOOD thing is that you are perfectly capable of defending anyone - including of course Yourself! So En Avant! and don't forget the windows and the shutters ;)
And, let's have a closer look at this witch-hunting "article" in the main UK press. Oh, it's written by a "CHIEF reporter"... an ironical laugh is sprouting out of me now. Some people have it real good these days. Nearly 3 millions job seekers in GB, most of whom are rightly qualified or even highly skilled, yet we still see privileged persons of this sort who can't even put their abilities (?) to good use. Mr Robert Mendick, where do you show in this article that you are adequately skilled and trained to WRITE for a main press newspaper?
Let's dissect "this":
"For almost five years, Kate and Gerry McCann have suffered the anguish of not knowing what happened to their daughter Madeleine."
NOT KNOWING? Where's YOUR EVIDENCE, Mr Mendick, to state THIS? Mr Mendick, you don't know else than I or any Joe Public know. As far as WE are concerned, WE don't know WHO knows WHAT.
"Through it all, they have also had to contend with a sustained campaign of harassment conducted by a small band of fanatics convinced they had a hand in their daughter's disappearance."
Wow. I MUST be part of the Jolly Band Wagon somehow! I feel it, as I've often in the past been insulted by these "team McCann" people, when just for example, putting up a video on You Tube to express my reactions, feelings and doubts in this case. Oh and as Tony knows, I've been once attending an "MF meeting", so here we go, I am very proud to announce to the World that I am an "obsessed fanatic", so be it. BUT hear me well: WE are NOT a "SMALL Band"! No no no, we are a BIIIIG 'band' of People, ALL over the World, who don't specially league in associations, syndicates, sects or foundations or groups of any other sort, however we ARE here, reading, watching, feeling, THINKING. And yes at times WE comment and blog. We are sometimes called Truth Seekers, this sits by me much better than 'fanatics', but 'sir' Mendick obviously thinks that Truth Seekers and People with an inquisitive mind are fanatics. Well, I do feel SORRY FOR YOU Mendick!!!
By the way, I deeply hope that Tony WINS over the mccanns. Note: I don't have to use upper cases for their name as they didn't use any to title their bewk "madeleine" [sic]. Because if Mr Bennett wins, he may then SUE you for this horrendous LIBEL you are freely widespreading from your 'high roof'! And I HOPE he DOES!
THINK about this one: this new case is now about libel, partly. But you, Mendick, what do you do while your job should be to expose a situation? Bang: you are FALLING into the very SAME TRAP that the prosecutors are attempting to set against their "PICKED BATTLE"! We ALL SEE that you are LIBELLING Mr Bennett, and many of us at the same go.
Wow. I MUST be part of the Jolly Band Wagon somehow! I feel it, as I've often in the past been insulted by these "team McCann" people, when just for example, putting up a video on You Tube to express my reactions, feelings and doubts in this case. Oh and as Tony knows, I've been once attending an "MF meeting", so here we go, I am very proud to announce to the World that I am an "obsessed fanatic", so be it. BUT hear me well: WE are NOT a "SMALL Band"! No no no, we are a BIIIIG 'band' of People, ALL over the World, who don't specially league in associations, syndicates, sects or foundations or groups of any other sort, however we ARE here, reading, watching, feeling, THINKING. And yes at times WE comment and blog. We are sometimes called Truth Seekers, this sits by me much better than 'fanatics', but 'sir' Mendick obviously thinks that Truth Seekers and People with an inquisitive mind are fanatics. Well, I do feel SORRY FOR YOU Mendick!!!
By the way, I deeply hope that Tony WINS over the mccanns. Note: I don't have to use upper cases for their name as they didn't use any to title their bewk "madeleine" [sic]. Because if Mr Bennett wins, he may then SUE you for this horrendous LIBEL you are freely widespreading from your 'high roof'! And I HOPE he DOES!
THINK about this one: this new case is now about libel, partly. But you, Mendick, what do you do while your job should be to expose a situation? Bang: you are FALLING into the very SAME TRAP that the prosecutors are attempting to set against their "PICKED BATTLE"! We ALL SEE that you are LIBELLING Mr Bennett, and many of us at the same go.
"Now, one of their main tormentors is facing jail for refusing to leave the McCanns' alone."
FACING JAIL? WHO SAYS THIS? YOU? What makes you think that Mr Bennett is actually FACING JAIL??? As a "TORMENTOR"?! But watch your words... For anyone who really harasses someone and libels them publicly CAN indeed face jail.
LEAVE THE MCCANNS ALONE... Hell after YOU Mendick who are cosily leaving ONE "little person" ALONE.... JUST as THEY did. Your sheetroll rant shows just how "much" you "do" CARE for HER! (Uh? Do you even se, right now, whom I mean? - for I don't see anything special as a mention to Her!)
FACING JAIL? WHO SAYS THIS? YOU? What makes you think that Mr Bennett is actually FACING JAIL??? As a "TORMENTOR"?! But watch your words... For anyone who really harasses someone and libels them publicly CAN indeed face jail.
LEAVE THE MCCANNS ALONE... Hell after YOU Mendick who are cosily leaving ONE "little person" ALONE.... JUST as THEY did. Your sheetroll rant shows just how "much" you "do" CARE for HER! (Uh? Do you even se, right now, whom I mean? - for I don't see anything special as a mention to Her!)
"Tony Bennett has waged a campaign since 2007 against the couple – repeatedly accusing them of covering up the girl's death in leaflets, books and on internet postings.
WRONG. Bennett has NOT done this! Re-read your sources. Anthony is far too clever to clearly accuse.... blah..... What YOU have interpreted from these articles, comments and booklets is YOUR analysis of it! Sue your own brain then?
WRONG. Bennett has NOT done this! Re-read your sources. Anthony is far too clever to clearly accuse.... blah..... What YOU have interpreted from these articles, comments and booklets is YOUR analysis of it! Sue your own brain then?
"On one occasion, the Madeleine Foundation, which he runs, handed out 1,500 pamphlets in Rothley, the couple's home village in Leicestershire, entitled "10 key reasons which suggest she was not abducted." " LEAFLETS, not "pamphlets"! God, where exactly did you learn your English, Mendick?
By the way, it's NOT illegal to distribute leaflets. Politicians do this at every round for their own campaigns. Do you write profanating articles each time this happens?
By the way, it's NOT illegal to distribute leaflets. Politicians do this at every round for their own campaigns. Do you write profanating articles each time this happens?
"Another booklet has been posted by registered delivery to the McCanns' home." Mmh... but you don't say WHO has posted it! -yet apparently you do hint that the MF did it! Booooh. (or did you not mean GUNNILL and his deceitful ways to pass himself as a "reseacher" to obtain the very copy of the booklet IN ORDER TO provide the McCanns with some "substance" to sue Mr Bennett?! - see Madeleine Foundation site for details - it seems that this 'coincidence' is now understood by all.)
Next month, a court will decide whether to jail Mr Bennett, 64, for contempt of court. "
Or whether to jail OTHERS perhaps? Oooh, then what would YOU write in The Telegraph? Because the CRUCIAL POINT that you omit here, is HOW do the MCCANN PAY FOR ALL HIS CHARADE courts-festival??? - Isn't it time a JUDGE would revise this FUND they use, that is initially made for their DAUGHTER MADDY, but is also stated to be helping them in LEGAL COSTS... to which extent? Legal costs for what? To sue anyone who doesn't believe them and publicly expresses themselves about it? Do all donators agree with this?
Does everybody also BELIEVE what Mrs Healy in the Kate McCann nom de plume wrote in her "madeleine book" about these legal people working for her for free?! Come on. WE have never seen this fund fully investigated. Yet THEY have fully investigated The Madeleine Foundation's accounts - but, AH, found nothing but good, healthy, honest and transparent results. I truly wonder, would it be the same for "The FIGHTING Fund"? *see www.findmadeleine.com
"The action is being brought by Mr and Mrs McCann who have grown increasingly disturbed by Mr Bennett's attacks on them."
WHY? WHAT HURTS? (re the old phrase "truth hurts"?)
Why would a "small band of fanatics" hurt grieving parents more than the source-event itself?
---Alert! Yesterday I have lost my purse in the local supermarket. It revealed, a pickpocket had it. This has truly hurt! I SO sympathise with Gerry and his 'lost wallet'. But SO many People then gave to the fund afterwards! They were all so generous. As Gerry says: "Most people are inherantly good."
"Mr Bennett is accused of flouting an agreement in the High Court – made in November 2009 – that he would stop repeating allegations that the McCanns were in some way involved in their daughter's abduction. " Well his local brief stated that this "agreement" was far too unrealistic - but Tony felt he had to comply with it - who can really ignore actions like 'mafia style' guys delivering big boxes in a Limo as not a threat?
"Since then, Mr Bennett, a grandfather-of-two from Harlow in Essex, who is obsessed with the case," [And YOU're NOT?] "has posted on the subject of Madeleine McCann's disappearance an astonishing 3,800 times on one website alone." Yeah so what that's 5 posts a day, Mr Bennett always has lots of replies to answer, beside, he is free to use his retired time as he wishes - or do I perceive an ounce of jealousy here? Tony's free to reply on Forums, with his FREE TIME, he's not stuck like SOME are on a newsdesk all day... And visibly, his activities are far more passionating than THAT!
Lawyers acting for the McCanns accuse him of breaching the undertaking on at least 149 occasions. The list of alleged breaches is not exhaustive." BUT ARE VOID I'd say.
"The McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: "This has gone on for a long time and Kate and Gerry now feel enough is enough." YEAH MCCANNS: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!! "It is obviously very distressing for them. The fact they are taking legal action speaks for itself. "LOL, an old habit...
"Tony Bennett is his own worst enemy by persistently doing what he does, he has brought this action on himself."
The McCanns are their worse enemies by persistently doing what they do, and by doing what they DID, THEY have brought this action on themselves. Mmh, sounds right, no? Better than the first version.
"The couple, both doctors, live in hope their daughter may still be alive and continue the search for her."
The couple, one doctor the other one a "dropout", live in great comfort and are extremely busy attending lots of courts to which they now excel at and continue to do so, despite the search for their 'missing' daughter should be the most urgent act they should commit to, but as it is well known they have NEVER taken part in any consistent physical search, and use the publicly funded money reserve to hire incompetent private detectives, and have refused to help the investigation by not providing important documents paramount to the SEARCH FOR THEIR daughter, such as Madeleine McCann's HEALTH RECORDS.
May the Judge represent True JUSTICE at all times.
From: The Lost Marketing Ploy Blog - dedicated to the Truth.
UPDATE: click on http://losingmarketingploy.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/hearing-mccanns-vs-bennett/
This is a great article. A truly well-written article posing so many questions and of course, highlighting so many valid points. It is clear from reading this article, and many on this site, and across the web, that the McCanns have been far too busy trying to silence people who have a different opinion to them.
ReplyDeleteIf the McCanns say Madeleine WAS abducted then they have to prove beyond reasonable doubt; which of course they haven't. Someone should be suiing THEM for false claims and untrue allegations.
The thing I see is with Mr Bennett and others like Pat Brown is they have not said EXACTLY what happened to Madeleine because both don't EXACTLY know and both will tell you they do not know EXACTLY but how come the McCanns know for sure that Madeleine was indeed abducted? Even without scientific or forensic evidence.
Mr Bennett and Pat Brown have brought to people's attention online when their theories (based on actual police facts) would never get near mainstream news. We have a lot to thank these people for because I for one know many people who once read Mr Bennett's drafts have two ways to look at things whereas before they only had one version: The McCanns' version. This is what the McCanns do not like; they do not like any other version than their own version.
If it was me, I would be too busy looking for my daughter...if I was sure she was alive. I couldn't care what people thought of me; I would just be too busy concentrating on finding my child.
There is a saying like, "Those who protest too much..." I can't remember the rest but you know what I mean.
Thank You Ano ;) for this sensible Comment. I agree so much with all you said! x
DeleteUpdate: please follow this link (or click on it directly in the post, bottom line): http://losingmarketingploy.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/hearing-mccanns-vs-bennett/
ReplyDeleteBrilliant.
ReplyDeleteThe net is closing in on the mccanns they are about to get caught and hopefully get jailed for life as they are a vile conniving cretins and about time they stopped jetting round on public money and pay the price for what they done . They should be hung , drawn and quartered together with their vile accomplices in Portugal as this is where the crime was committed !
ReplyDeleteIts clear there has been a huge manipulation, by the mccanns in contradiction, the insanity of these people is more disturbing in why they feel the need to silence anyone?
ReplyDeleteHow can they sue anyone on the grounds of the facts tony was observing!
In arrogance Gerry stated prove we killed our daughter?
How can then anyone prove they didn't if all is silenced!
The shutter story is a lie even their pr spokes person excepts?
This in itself proves they gave police false information about a abduction, I would think this strengthens what tony has stated about a accident, and a possible cover up?
He has simply agreed with what the detective concluded after kate wouldn't answer the questions, that held up their investigation.
If the investigation had removed them from any possible involvement after answering all the questions to clear them propaly, how is it possible to state tony brought this on himself?