WHY HAVE THE MCCANNS, THEIR FRIENDS & FAMILY NOT BEEN TRIED? DO YOU KNOW THEY HAVE PAID TWO LAWYERS JUST TO ESCAPE THE NORMAL PROCEDURE IN THE VERY EARLY DAYS in May 2007?: Yes, A COURT WITH JUDGE AND JURY WHERE THEY SHOULD HAVE WITNESSED THEIR VERSIONS OF THE EVENTS. Money buys everything, does it?
This is important, and for JUSTICE itself. So I support this incentive for a TRIAL TO THE MCCANNS. Under Oath, do your very BEST, in the Name of your Daughter, to answer the questions! WHY DID YOU LIE????!!!!!!! YES you DID LIE, about the so-called "damaged" shutters AND the NOT "broken, shattered WINDOW"
THIS is what you told your worried FAMILY on that night between the 3rd and the 4th May 2007: LIES. LIES which they repeated, as planned, to the MEDIA. We ALL remember, proof has been collected.
Do you know what, McCanns? You should ACTUALLY VOLUNTEER to have a TRIAL, instead of taking People to courts. SHAME ON YOU. SHAME!
For NORMAL JUSTICE, you may too, dear Reader, ask for a TRIAL to get the TRUTH about what happened to this Little Child:
WHAT WOULD SHERLOCK HOLMES DO? (What really happened Part2)
Famous for ruling stuff out and what was left would be the truth let us apply his M O to this seemingly complex case but which probably isn't. "She's been abducted" scream each McCann to each family member down the phone the night of May 3rd 2007. They don't just tell one family member and request they spread the word. No. They repeat the same mantra separately to each individual relative. To bolster their story they also say "The shutters have been smashed", also repeatedly.
The first thing Holmes would do is check the veracity of their claim of the shutters being disturbed. He immediately sees they have NOT been and finds only one fingerprint. That of Kate's. Knowing that the parents in a missing child case are the first, and indeed most likely suspects of maldeeds, he already knows the McCanns are guilty (of something) given they have lied about the shutters. He knows he is looking at an attempt to stage an abduction, the word "ABDUCTION" the two have bellowed at their relatives, and somewhat surprisingly, the media and priests before even searching for their missing child, something "normal" parents would be doing.
Given that the McCanns spokesman, Mitchell, had to grudgingly concede that the shutters were NOT dislodged or tampered with TEAM McCANN subsequently change their story to leaving a door unlocked. We need go no further to know who is the guilty party here. The attempt to stage an abduction fails and has demonstrably failed.
The cadaver dog and blood dog identify blood on the wall and the scent of death in their apartment 5A, where no one had died before. Consider then: 5A, no one died in there before, McCanns holiday in there and are one child down and blood and afterwards blood and death scent in there..
DCI Redwood. Are you sure you are in the right job?
BBC PROPAGANDA WAS ON MENU TONIGHT. A OLD DISH ONLY RESERVED VERY COLD THOUGH. THIS IS NEW ENGLAND, NEW SCOTLAND YARD, NEW WORLD ORDER
You'd think I'm writing a Spoof, wouldn't you? Well, not.
As quoted in the Express Co Uk:"Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood said he believes her disappearance was a stranger abduction, as he said there are 195 "investigative opportunities"."
So Ola, d'abord, Monsieur, what IS the JOB of a DETECTIVE? It's to INVESTIGATE. If you start your investigation "BELIEVING" something then you are BIASED, and acting like quite an IDIOT to be honest. I'll go beyond this: Andy Redwood, you do NOT deserve your position and you SHOULD be SACKED. In fact I'd love to see Amaral back on the scene in Portugal and you REMOVED from the Scotland Yard. I would clap: BRAVO!!!!!
BBC One tonight was broadcasting a Panorama titled on their website: "Madeleine - The last hope?" but, LOL, curiously as a few friends and I switched it on it was titled on the tv screen: " The Liverpool Titanic Girl"!!! Did they mean Kate Healy I wonder?
By the way thank you to Joana Morais for having blogged about this in order to pre-inform us all about it.
On Joana's site we can read a pre-article about the Panorama programme: "Panorama also interviews former Home Secretary Alan Johnson MP, who criticises
the initial Portuguese investigation of the daughter of Kate and Gerry
McCann.
“It seems to be disgraceful,” says Johnson. “It didn’t seem to me
that they had had the benefit of a proper police investigation into the
disappearance of Madeleine.”
Johnson was the first Home Secretary to
carry out a feasibility study into whether the Metropolitan Police could review
the investigation. He met Madeleine’s parents and says: “I was enormously
sympathetic to their case. All the stuff that appeared in certain tabloids
suggesting they were the guilty party, you know it’s very difficult under that
kind of saturation coverage not to start believing in some of those theories.
But by the time they came in to see me I was absolutely clear that they were the
victims in all this.” " (Here we go, once again. How many times do we have to teach them the SAME lesson?! Who IS/WAS the REAL VICTIM in all this??? WHO, would you think? Thank you. And stop bashing our ears with your propaganda, you most ef thee "media", cause NEXT TIME, WE WON'T WATCH IT!)
Mr JOHNSON, what is DISGRACEFUL is to IGNORE the FACTS like YOU and the charming BBC DO. Never, NEVER in your words or in the rest of that "McCannorama" as Joana says, we have heard anything about
1) The LIES BY THE INNOCENT MCCANNS about the "forced entry",
2) The CADAVER ODOUR spotted by highly trained POLICE DOGS, the BLOOD, etc
3) The CONTRADICTIONS in statements, all of them, between the "Heroes" and their "Seven Stars",
4) the issue of MURAT: why did this one recently co-sign a letter with the McCanns? Even tonight on BBC McCannorama he was still feeling stressed out from the HARM that the McCanns' friends caused him, by using the police against him, to follow and stalk him, then ACCUSE him, etc, etc, he was saying himself he only realises NOW what has happened to him, YET, Mr Robert Murat Still Kindly and Fondly Accepts to do what??? To SIGN A LETTER written at the incentive of the McCanns! COME-ON.
5) the more than strange ATTITUDES and reactions of the McCanns all throughout the "post 3rd May 07" events. Whatever these events were, no other "grieving" parent has ever shown themselves up in these ostentatious, arrogant, greedy and celebrity-like ways. COME-ON!
Let's take a backdated look at our Innocent Victims:
Oh, did forget to mention their DOUBLE HELPING from their "search for Madeleine"-MEGA FUND to pay for their "Rothley Manor" MORTGAGE? And that's not all... the list of OBVIOUS pointers is too long to include in this post. I recommend the reading of Mr Amaral's Book for more details. Other books like Faked Abduction by Brian Johnson may also come handy.
Back to the McCannorama:
By the way...Is it true what is said in Portugal, that a PACT was made in 2008? a SECRET PACT between the two countries: Great Britain and Portugal... -But I suspect, there again to try and remain fair to my informers who support Mr Amaral too, that G.Amaral's played-down tone was the works of the BBC being at its best tricks again: using every bit they could to make it all look likeALL was OK in the UK, and that the McCanns are OF COURSE, INNOCENT!
And, you know what, BBC so-called impartial media? When you as a TV channel are TRYING TO MAKE THINGS LOOK LIKE SOMETHING ELSE, it is, purely and simply, called:
PROPAGANDA.
It needs spelt out for them, let's call a cat a cat, and a child monster-desertor a child monster-desertor. Or NEGLECTOR. All of you who condone the McCann's CRIME OF NEGLECT and (other) disguised action BECAUSE YOU ARE in fact SCARED OF THE BLUFF THEY CONDUCT, ALL OF YOU, ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MORE CHILD ABANDONMENT AND MORE CHILD NEGLECT (NOT TO MENTION CHILD ABUSE). You ALL FACILITATE it by MINIMISING the FACTS and being hypocritically, cowardly COMPLACENT to it.
All that low-life got is a MERE 12 months imprisonment AND he's banned from working around Children for ONLY 10 years!
Why ten years? Normally people like that would get banned for LIFE from working with Children. Why 12 months jail? Has the police tried to investigate on the SOURCE of the MATERIAL PHYSICS TEACHER ANDREW WARD was using?? Tell me, after his healthy 12 months' break in a cosy jail, how can he ever be prevented from buying a laptop and viewing LIVE footages of kids who suffer sex abuse, again??
That bastard was also hanging around BEBO! collecting GIRLS' PHOTOS - advice: if you're on social networks, make sure your account is set for strict privacy...
A TEACHER has pleaded guilty to taking indecent images of children and storing extreme material on his computer.
Andrew Ward has been suspended from his post at Canon Slade School in Bolton.
Yesterday, he pleaded guilty to six counts of possessing indecent photographs of children, six charges of taking indecent photographs of children and one count of possessing extreme pornography involving animals.
It is understood the images ranged from levels one to five, five being the worst, and the computer had thousands of images and videos stored on it.
Ward, aged 46, was suspended from the Bradshaw school in November after police executed a search warrant at his home.
His computer and storage devices were seized.
The offences occurred between October 24, 2010, and July 1, 2011.
Ward, of Crompton Road, Lostock, has been bailed to an address in Leeds, and will be sentenced at Bolton Crown Court on April 11.
His solicitor, James Towey, made an application for Ward’s name and address not to be published.
But The Bolton News opposed the application, and it was refused.
Parents received a letter yesterday from the school, which said: “We are writing to inform you that a teacher from this school has been charged by Greater Manchester Police for offences regarding the possession of indecent images of children.
“The school is most concerned and saddened by the nature of the allegations.
“We are co-operating fully with the police investigation together with the Bolton local authority and the Diocese of Manchester to support their inquiries.”
A spokesman for the Diocese of Manchester said: “We are shocked by the nature of these crimes.
“The diocese takes all incidents involving the safety and welfare of children very seriously. Any abusive or inappropriate use of the internet by staff employed in CE schools is completely unacceptable, and staff found guilty of such abuse should be subject to the full weight of employment and criminal legislative powers.
Against such a backdrop, individuals should then be held to account for their own behaviours and actions.”
News
Original Comment
"I went to Canon Slade and we all thought this guy was wrong, we called him a paedophile behind his back and even made remarks to other teachers about him. If the staff as CS didnt show the students blatant ignorance, as if we knew nothing then this dangerous man would have been caught sooner. He was suspended once before, for supposedly locking a girl in a stock cupboard, turning off the light and feeling her up. Why was he let back into school? Yes Canon Slade is a good school, but it's because the students are willing to learn (even when their teachers are incapable) but the fact that CS put me and others in danger because they refused to listen and deal with the situation (and embarrassment) makes me sick."
Ladies And Gents, no you're NOT watching The Dafty News right now. As you can read, this has TRULY HAPPENED. That "school" has been warned about that PAEDO way before he finally got caught, as you can read. But as usual, who are Children? Teens? Obviously, "garbage to just ignore".
DO NOT IGNORE YOUR CHILD or TEEN WHEN HE / SHE TRIES TO TELL YOU SOMETHING.
*The exemption under section 27 exists to
protect the United Kingdom's international relations, its interests abroad and
the United Kingdom's ability to protect and promote those interests. [full PDF
here]
Section
27 consists of two different kinds of exemption:
Section 27(1) focuses on
the effects of disclosure rather than on the type of information. Information is
exempt if its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice any of the
matters mentioned in section 27(1)(a) - (d):
a) relations between the UK
and any other state
b) relations between the UK and any international
organisation or international court
c) the interests of the UK
abroad
d)the promotions or protection by the UK of its interests
abroad Section 27(2) protects confidential information obtained from a
foreign state, an international organisation, or an international court. Section
27(2) describes information by reference to its origins and the circumstances in
which it was obtained.
There's no way Jim Gamble didn't know he was putting victims at risk with the CEOP website, he deliberately exposed their details to every paedo on the planet!!!
Hi Ladies And Gentlemen. As you would expect such a title, had it been in the British press, to expose how vile and horrendous the "abductor" like the swarthy moustache-Man of Gail Cooper, or the other similarly bad foreign raptors "really are", well now is the time to disenchant and face reality, away from the fairies and the elves of your childhood books.
For, Ladies and Gentlemen, the very PEOPLE who have ACTUALLY PLAYED Mind Games To Madeleine's Twin Siblings are no one else but these children's parents themselves.
Ok let me show you, it won't take a long winded monologue that eats half of your day in reading, and I won't facebook you in a desperate call for fame! So, straight to the point:
12:01AM GMT 01 Feb 2008 Gerry and Kate McCann will throw a birthday party for their twins tomorrow - complete with a card from their missing four-year-old daughter, Madeleine.
In full: The Madeleine McCann investigation They want to give Sean and Amelie, who will be three, as normal a life as possible in the face of the continuing international hunt for Madeleine, who was abducted on holiday in Portugal. Around 30 family, friends and supporters of the McCanns' campaign to find her have been invited to their home in Rothley, Leics.Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns' spokesman, said British police did not believe the couple were involved in her disappearance. He said Leicestershire Police child protection officers viewed the case as a "rare stranger abduction".Related ArticlesNew Madeleine suspect lookalike found 28 Jan 2008
-End of quote in this Telegraph article.
Food for thoughts, eh, but, hang on there is also... the monster game...
Press quote:
FIND THE MADELEINE MONSTER
TRUTH ABOUT THE McCANNS: BY TOP UK CRIME CRACKER
By Daniel Jones, people.co.uk
Maddie's little brother and sister are learning to cope with their devastating loss by playing a game called Find The Monster Who Snatched Her.
And three-year-old twins Sean and Amelie are also playing a vital role in keeping their mum and dad focused, according to top criminologist Ray Wyre.
He told The People last night: "I think having other very young children has given Kate and Gerry the strength to go on.
"It must be hard for them because the twins are now almost the same age as Maddie was when she was taken.
"But they are clearly a bundle of energy and fun.
"They still talk about Madeleine and even bring her into their games."
Wyre went on: "Kate and Gerry told me they were sitting together the other day when the twins rushed into the room screaming and shouting.
"They asked what they were up to and the twins told them they were going to go and find the monster that took Maddie.
"Then they dashed off to play the game."
He added: "Of course, it's a very sad story.
"But it's healthy that Madeleine remains a real presence in their lives."
You would perhaps wonder if grieving parents would actually tolerate in their hearts such games... surely it would only revive painful memories to everyone so what was even the point to print this in the press? Had Mr late Ray Wyre wanted to drop a "little point" he had noticed while , deep-down, analysing the behaviour of these "responsible parents", who were so thoughtful to bring a bouquet of fresh flowers to his wife for dinner and had tucked into her home-made lasagna and banoffee pie? Again, FOOD FOR THOUGHTS. Is it any wonders - if these young twins in 2008 were really taking the initiative to play the monster game - that such ideas could spring to their minds when they received "birthday cards" from their Sister Madeleine? -oh, and GIFTS of course, see: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2833105/Birthday-gift-from-Maddie-McCann-for-twins.html#ixzz0eFJ7mkph You know what? I find all this SICK -and sickening. Apart from an "expert in criminology", who would genuinely be needed of course, I seriously urge an expert in Child Protection to lean on this case asap.
Here is the pasting.
Edited for English correction, a post that caught my interest:
MADDY (MCCANN) CASE: What are they on about, : "£1 pays for A Multi Lingual Call Centre for ONE HOUR" --in which bloody country? Taiwan? Thailand, if that???? That is a DISGRACE, tabling on CHEAP labour, what QUALITY of PROFESSIONALISM do they actually expect from a serious Investigation INFORMATION call treatment? Do they associate foreign languages with PROSTITUTION by any chance????!!!!! Racist people! EXPLOITING LOW PROFILES!
Much better quality video-site than the ads-riddled 'you tube' (champion site for hosting videos that nobody can ever watch in full), who by the way allowed flaggers/ other 'sheriffs' of freedom of speech to delete Tony's work there, never mind because it's all safely reposted THERE, on Vimeo!
-please note that this video is downloadable! ;-) - These are the questions that Madeleine's mother refused to answer under POLICE INTERVIEW. She used her status of "arguida" (MAIN SUSPECT) to choose not to. My question is, again, now that she is not a 'main suspect' any longer, what prevents the Portuguese police from asking these -and more- questions??? In the end as you will see, as the officer asks her if she is aware that refusing the questions will be detrimental to her daughter's investigation, she replies "YES, IF IT'S WHAT THE INVESTIGATION THINKS." Welcome to watch, simply click on the video-title:
What would your own questions or requests be? Mine is about the Child's HEALTH RECORDS, that her parents refused to hand over to the police - but from which law can't the British police DEMAND these records, and even get them with a warrant? Had anyone else been a MAIN SUSPECT in any other serious case, especially a MISSING CHILD'S CASE, surely they would have no choice in the matter! So once again, here's a flagrant instance of DELIBERATE SABOTAGE of their own CHILD INVESTIGATION! -and obvious PROTECTION. Mrs HEALY, Dr MCCANN: once again, WHY? WHY DO YOU SABOTAGE THE INVESTIGATION FOR MADELEINE?
-You are free to reply my question and views in the Comments space below, be my guests.- M.
"Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears
Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.
“She died in the apartment as a result of a tragic accident and the parents simulated an abduction after failing to care of their children,” Tavares de Almeida, former chief inspector at Portimao police station during the initial months of the investigation, told the court in Lisbon.
“These were the conclusions of a police report signed by me on September 10 2007,” he added."
Since this old news article was published TWICE in a row, well over ONE YEAR LATER, yesterday and today (please see post below), I might as well make TWO posts about it. It is THEIR headlines I am only reproducing. I have no idea why this huge media is choosing to repost these news, that were sensational, and some would say, "not very helpful to find Madeleine", when no related event but a book on pre-sale is really happening. But this must be coincidence.
Has any marketing ploy become part of a huger marketing plan, by any chance? Or are there some concerned people out there, concerned that a case for a child is archived, with no indication that her investigation would have any good reason to get archived in the first place? The curious matter is left to anyone's guess. We can still write to the media and ask... perhaps we would get lucky enough not to receive a stereotyped letter back in our faces.
It reminds me that, back in 2007, I had had ENOUGH of these media that were (almost all) saying that "Madeleine McCann has been abducted, snatched from her bed in Praia Da Luz", so I massively emailed all these to ask which proof exactly they had to state this. Since they had none, it could only be disinformation - and WHY? Why do disinformation in a little child's case? was my big question to them.
I also chose to write about my incentive around a few public forums and comments spaces. Better not leave these efforts in secrecy... I think that many others joined me in the action, because a little while later, we saw some changes in the general press statements. Maddy wasn't abducted any longer. She was MISSING, difference. Only some media (the type of cheap sheetroll, with a strong odour of racism and taste of ...) were still obstinate into forcing the abduction on. Some jumped from the ditch to the fence, it was an in-between: Maddy was feared abducted. Fair enough, it's very scary to have the thought of any (of YOUR) child abducted.
Some supra-intelligent people with sheer powers like Mrs Justice HOGG were, in a vindictive passion, ordering "the abductor" to come and fall onto their knees in front of her, and confess. She PONDERED that the McCanns were "RESPONSIBLE" parents. I do not know where Mrs HOGG got her child-care diplomas from, do they sometimes come as a bonus gift with tins of sardines? Because, Mrs HOGG, you see, I never knew that an attitude like this of the McCanns in matter of parenting, can EVER be considered as responsible.
So Ok, according to you, Mrs Justice HOGG, they WERE responsible, and Madeleine WAS abducted. She became your "child of Justice" with a WOC. Had you meant a WACK in the poor child's face, you would have done even better, because where are you now? What do you do for Madeleine, exactly? Are you aware of the seriousness, heaviness of HER situation? They were responsible, doing organised child neglect, she was abducted, because they were so responsible, it makes great sense. Your protected parent (the female of them) was writing a diary, where she stated a few things that surely would catch your attention, like the mentioning of paedophiles that want to make HER tear her OWN skin off, but after this, Mrs HOGG, did you see the sort of photos that they were publicly posting? Feared abducted, Madeleine McCann, three years old, WACKED with MAKE-UP. Is this wise you think, for a potential paedophile raptor?
Child-care, you said? Of which kind, may I ask?
So, Mrs Hogg, Mr Cameron, Mr Brown, Mr Blair, Mr Mitchell, Mr Kennedy, Mr Murdoch, MrMagalhaes e Menezes, now you can all tell us: where is the case for this Little Child, MADELEINE MCCANN, going? Do you have a conscience? If not, as we suspect, at least you do have a job the RESPONSIBILITIES of which you have to fulfill. A PUBLIC job means PUBLIC DUTIES, before private profits. Or BE more honest: what is the wider agenda? Any thought for the TRUTH and the JUSTICE for this little person? Start by doing what you're best at: your JOB, by the basics, instead of taking the money and laughing your face off Madeleine. Try JUSTICE if you do justice. Try CARE if you really care. And try reporting on the TRUTH if you own newspapers. But STOP messing us all around like that, because we seriously are saturated with your putrefied food, it leaves a bitter taste in our mouths. And some spirits above are getting REALLY over agitated.
Let us look at various elements in these comparisons and spot interesting "anomalies":
The first photo as showed in the British online press was identified by myself as from /around the Christmas time 2006: approximately 4 months before Madeleine (featuring on the photo, next to her little brother Sean) 's missing event. I have used landmarks in videos and photos to determine this date and am certain of it - and can prove it. The second photo shows her little Brother Sean: approximately 9 months after the first photo. 9 months is a significant amount of time in any toddler growth. Which clothes would fit the same toddler 9 months after? And isn't it strange that he was wearing exactly the same outfit, in September 2007, as 4 months before his Sister's 'missing' day? - Isn't it also curious that the exactly same-looking little boy is showed in the public press photo-gallery 4 or 5 months before and 4 months after? -please feel free to comment, I do not forbid Freedom Of Speech - unlike SOME.
There's no way Jim Gamble didn't know he was putting victims at risk with the CEOP website, he deliberately exposed their details to every paedo on the planet!!!
