"DCI Redwood. Are you sure you are in the right job?"

• Options
• 

  Mark Ward

  WHAT WOULD SHERLOCK HOLMES DO? (What really happened Part2)
  
  Famous for ruling stuff out and what was left would be the truth let us apply his M O to this seemingly complex case but which probably isn't.
  "She's been abducted" scream each McCann to each family member down the phone the night of May 3rd 2007.
  They don't just tell one family member and request they spread the word.
  No. They repeat the same mantra separately to each individual relative.
  To bolster their story they also say "The shutters have been smashed", also repeatedly.
  
  The first thing Holmes would do is check the veracity of their claim of the shutters being disturbed. He immediately sees they have NOT been and finds only one fingerprint. That of Kate's. Knowing that the parents in a missing child case are the first, and indeed most likely suspects of maldeeds, he already knows the McCanns are guilty (of something) given they have lied about the shutters. He knows he is looking at an attempt to stage an abduction, the word "ABDUCTION" the two have bellowed at their relatives, and somewhat surprisingly, the media and priests before even searching for their missing child, something "normal" parents would be doing.
  
  Given that the McCanns spokesman, Mitchell, had to grudgingly concede that the shutters were NOT dislodged or tampered with TEAM McCANN subsequently change their story to leaving a door unlocked. We need go no further to know who is the guilty party here. The attempt to stage an abduction fails and has demonstrably failed.
  
  The cadaver dog and blood dog identify blood on the wall and the scent of death in their apartment 5A, where no one had died before.
  Consider then: 5A, no one died in there before, McCanns holiday in there and are one child down and blood and afterwards blood and death scent in there..
  
  DCI Redwood. Are you sure you are in the right job?

  

  Unlike ·  · Unfollow Post · Yesterday at 09:56

  • You, Warren Thornton and 20 others like this.

Ola Good News!!!

THE RETURN OF THE MAC (HELL, NO! THE BOOK!!)

Hi, I don't know if this has been reported this time, as wide and high as the "Mccannorama" ;) from the BBC, anyway if it hasn't, here's the shout:

G. AMARAL's BOOKS were to be returned yesterday 26th April 2012 to his publishers. Were they? A few people have exclaimed - and rightly- that the BBC "Panorama" was a strategy (of PROPAGANDA, as I've already qualified it) to DIVERT from this presumably known in advance FACT.

By the way the BBC has never mentioned (or correct me if I'm wrong) that Mr G. AMARAL has WON this trial against the McCanns and that the 7 500 copies of his CONFISCATED BOOKS were DUE BACK TO HIM, and subsequently FREE to be sold again. Consequently they are also FREE to be translated into ENGLISH and PUBLISHED IN GREAT BRITAIN.

(Curiously from what I understand they were never banned anywhere else but in Portugal or other Portuguese speaking countries, but no publisher in GB had ever had the "gutts" to put it on the Market! W@nkers, LOL)

Here's the GOOD NEWS sum-up from this site (Joana Morais)

Copy: "

McCann Case: Judge orders the immediate return of Gonçalo Amaral's Book

14 March 2012 | Posted by Joana Morais Leave a Comment

Following the ruling of the Court of Appeals of Lisbon on October 14, 2010 in which the judges decreed that Gonçalo Amaral's books could be sold, revoking the first judgement of the Court a quo [lower court/court decision's that was appealed] that had granted a banning injunction, and in a new legal setback for the McCanns, we can now confirm that the judge has ordered the immediate return of the 7.500 copies of the book "Maddie, the Truth of the Lie" that were entrusted to Isabel Duarte, lawyer of the McCann couple. The lawyer has, of today, 10 working days to fulfil that order.

On the other hand, we are also able to confirm that one of the several claims for defamation made by the McCann couple against several Portuguese persons, specifically one targeting criminal psychologist and university professor Dr. Paulo Sargento as been archived by the Public Ministry. Nevertheless, and according to information that was provided to us, the McCanns' lawyer, Isabel Duarte, intends to proceed with the claim despite not having the backing of the Public Ministry.

In Spanish at Mercedes's blog, with muchas gracias for the breaking news.

Update

The Civil Court of Lisbon notified the McCanns' lawyer on Tuesday

Early on this week, the lawyer for Guerra & Paz book publishers said that the book copies were stored at a warehouse in the area of Matinha in Lisbon, and that, they should be returned as soon as there was a court order. The 1st Circuit of the Civil Court of Lisbon [the same court that had granted the initial injunction on September 9, 2009] has now notified, Isabel Duarte, the books' trustee, ordering her to return the books to Guerra & Paz, within 10 days.

in O Crime, paper edition, nº 1546, pages 12 to 14, March 15, 2012

«I expect the McCann couple to respect the court order, and within 10 days, to return to us all the copies (about 7500) of the book 'Maddie, The Truth of the Lie'.»

Gonçalo Amaral, retired PJ coordinator, who investigated the case.

in Correio da Manhã, paper edition, page 15, March 15, 2012

Update on March 23, 2012
The mandatary and lawyer of the McCann couple, Isabel Duarte, has until the 29th of this month to return the books; the 10 days deadline are not consecutive and are measured as working days. Meanwhile, the lawyer to whom the books were entrusted by the First Instance Civil Court of Lisbon, has been trying to delay the restitution of the books to its rightful owners as ordered by the Supreme Court of Justice alleging that the Court of Appeals judgement did not transit in rem judicatam [unappealable decision/final ruling].
"

________________________________________________ Thank You.

Another good piece of news perhaps? MPs Want 'Presumed Dead' Law For The Missing (<--click to know more)

If you tolerate THIS then YOUR Children will be NEXT.

My Respect, Sympathy and Encouragements to the Sister and All her Family and Friends of MISSING Mr Richey Edwards,

former Guitarist of the Great Manic Street Preachers.

Richey has been missing since 1995.

No "fund" has ever been arranged in order to "look for him".

RESPECT.

NO PRIME MINISTER HAS EVER GRANTED £ MILLIONS TO REVIEW HIS CASE. CONTEMPT! RICHEY EDWARDS IS STILL MISSING .

THE BBC AND ALL OTHERS SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIM IN THE LIGHTS.

SO SHOULD HAVE THE GREAT BRITISH GOVERNMENT.

BUT...

THEY HAVE NOT.

Maddy Age-Progression Lab - Upgraded

Spoof by our scorching, inimitable KA OSSIS!
-"upgraded" by your Friend Mega ;0) -

Note that "Maddy" would now be nearly NINE years old, but, technically, OK, "she"would be eight. It's approaching her "birthday". Of course "it"'s approaching her "anniversary" too.
So NO stone un-turned, we all get it, yeah I will NOT leave ONE stone unturned..., I might as well get to Egypt and ask everyone there why so many stones were turned, now all tombs and sarcophages have been raided and appear completely EMPTY. Have they seen Maddy too? Oh well, perhaps the same isn't happening regarding the MADDY's FUND after all, is it EMPTY? Or does it only appear to be so?

Curiously if my own fund gets emptied then I fill it up by work, hard one, but in the case of Mrs Kate HEALY I see that she still holds, proudly, the key for the Rothley "Manor", NOT having to job-search nor having to re-train as a Doctor. Busy times, busy ways. Updating a "bewk" must be "hell", oh dear.

Anyway any other time - and this one is NO exception- that approaches "Maddy's Anniversary" (3rd May) or "Birthday" next, (12th May), sees a myriad of Sightings and an equally abundant flurry of press-articles.

Curiously, very curiously in fact, when it's about an opponent WINNING A TRAL IN COURT, like Mr G. AMARAL recently regarding his Book, A Verdade Di Mentira, (Truth about the LIES), the TRUTH of the FACTS is COMPLETELY BLANKED, BLACKED OUT, by ALL "media".

Anyway here is an "image" that is supposed to represent "our Maddy" right NOW, at nearly NINE years old:

Mmh, Olivia Newton John at 55? (after visible cosmetic surgery)  OMG what has happened on the ears lobe?!- - - Why do they always have to look American??

IS THAT WHAT AN EIGHT YEAR OLD IS SUPPOSED TO BE LOOKING LIKE? Both grandmothers must be so proud: Oh look! She looks like ME!

Source: Express Co Uk

Reminder:

It says in French: LOOK INTO MY EYES, etc. So once again, with no more concern than hot chinese lanterns massively threw into the air or else dangerous colony of balloons, we all saw a pair of parents who left their kids, THREE under THREE years old, ALONE, UNATTENDED in a holiday flat, claiming very strangely that , due to a "forced entry" with so-called "smashed windows" and "damaged shutter" (LIES!!!!), their nearly 4 years old "Madeleine" was "abducted", on top of it were also URGING EVERYBODY TO LOOK INTO EVERYBODY ELSE'S CHILD'S EYES!

 

WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?!!

Excuse me Mr Cameron, but these uncaring, neglecting people you grant private interviews to in your PM office, using tax payers money, use and abuse your paid time, and ours, big style. Why don't you BOOT them in the BUTT and launch the Social Services on them?! This should calm them down for a little while. You would also do your DUTY.

Mr Cameron, you should also set the POLICE on them, for public lie and misuse of media, and abuse of public trust in their vast appeals for donations. Yes, use and abuse of public trust, because this has happened in England too, and in the rest of Great Britain, not just in Portugal. The people here have been lied to and even hidden facts!

Mr Cameron, you should also look at what happens to other cases where lies and fraud are suspected - if not totally evident like in the case of their "forced entry" which was not even a theory, but mere, gross fabrication. The McCanns still knock at your door and ask for special treatment, so why don't you take the usual measures and set a good old fashion TRIAL to question these two globe trotters, and allow the true LIGHT be shed on the biggest enigma of the year 2007?
I'm sure if you reacted the way you really should, Mr Cameron, they would stop FOR GOOD coming knocking at your door and waste your precious time. I think you should mind  the Homeless, the energy bills, the lack of electric re-fuel point for Electric Cars, the lack of flexibility for people who start a business, Education and, of course, the NHS. Or are the Mcanns STILL more important that all this in your eyes?! If so I'd really need to know WHY!

Thank you for reading.

Neatly Scheduled Business! MCCANNS LISBON SILENCED COURT

Where INCOME from a BUSINESS SCHEDULED RACE is far more "important" than the FACTS...



Yep, not ONE second wasted. Yet.. my question is:
1) How did the McCanns "know!" that they'd be FREE from court for the race??

Another question wandering through my brain:
2) HOW could they raise money BEFORE the race?

And yet another question, perhaps the most important of all:

3) WHY DIDN'T THE BRITISH MEDIA REPORT ON THIS LASTEST COURT??!!! After searching high and low, the ONLY links I get is: a- Mercedes Blog , b- Joana Morais blog with Mercedes' translated post (see a- !) on it. After this if you gogle " McCann, Court, Lisbon, Amaral, March, 2012 " all you get is: this blog of mine, the 2 ones I've just mentioned, and, so far, just another blog or two, like "Little Morsals". Well, fatty arses, are you still hibernating in the BBC Lounges? What happened to Anaorak...??? and to EVERYBODY ELSE? "Maddy WAS here" tv documentary - or MOCKumentarium!!!!


ITV? Anyone else who has always been "on the rolling BALL"?! SKY!!!  Seriously, This Is London SHIT and all SHEETROLLS, the SEXpress, The Slow, Slow telegraph and all..... The Tit-tits DayLight... We have YOU ALL SNAPPED! You and your (big?) ZERO BALLS!

Cause when it's not JUST QUITE to say: "Ooops this time the McFuckers didn't win" (copyright a Friend) (yes I need to keep me off the carter fucking!), it's: "THE NAZI SILENCE OF AUSCHWITZ"!!!!!

Here's a CLEAR view, the result of a previous search, when I already was very DUBIOUS about that GHOST COURT...:

What's all this about now? Look at the MAYHEMS in dates! "Kate runs for charity again-- 17th March 2012- today's the 15th and the McCanns were just in COURT! (wtf?!)

PRO-MCs SITE source: http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t3903-kate-runs-for-charity-again#43112

 

Source: FACEBOOK·

Ben NEEDHAM New Artistic Impression

"Ben at 21

We cannot tell with any certainty exactly how Ben would look today. There are many factors to take into account, including skin tone based on his current location, how he wears his hair, if he dyes it etc. He may also wear glasses or have a thick beard. He may even have long hair.

But this portrait encompasses what Ben would look like based on his photo as a child and in comparison to his family members. It should also be noted that his birthmarks are also important in finding him."

-Digital portrait by Tristam ROSSIN-

WEBSITE FOR BEN: http://www.helpfindben.co.uk/ben---new-image.html



MISSING CHILD case SILENCED!

Katrice Lee's family demands missing child's case files

Katrice Lee was believed drowned although her body was never found

Wow - the MISSING FILES!

Look at this beauty! Quick Share:

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MISSING_PAGES.htm

I love Truthers. 

MANY THANKS TO ALBYM FOR THE TRANSLATION, ONCE AGAIN! And to our dear Pamalam of course! and PJ! And Portugal! Thanks to everybody, LOL!

Ben NEEDHAM's Mum: A Fair Request

 http://www.helpfindben.co.uk/investigation.html

"Kerry Needham, the mother of Ben Needham, the British toddler who was abducted on Crete 20 years ago, said: “I am pleased for the McCann family and look forward to the government offering the same support to all the families with children missing abroad.”

Source:  http://news-top-stories.netsimpler.com/madeleine-mccann-case-pm-criticised-for-calling-in-metropolitan-police/

More...:

Madeleine McCann case: PM criticised for calling in Metropolitan police

Posted: May 13th, 2011 | Author: admin | Filed under: Top Stories | Tags: 'Madeleine, calling, Case, criticised, McCann, Metropolitan, police | No Comments »

Peers describe David Cameron’s intervention in case – after Kate McCann’s open letter to Sun – as PR exercise

Two peers who are members of police watchdogs warned that the independence of the Metropolitan police was under threat after the prime minister brought in Scotland Yard to review the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.
Insiders at the Yard played down any suggestions that their role could quickly lead to any breakthrough in the case, saying that the review, which will cost millions of pounds, could take months or even years.
Labour’s Lord Harris, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, accused David Cameron of bowing to Rupert Murdoch’s empire, referring to Cameron’s decision to call in Scotland Yard after Kate McCann wrote an open letter in the Sun asking for his help.
Lord Bradshaw, the Liberal Democrat peer and vice-chairman of Thames Valley Police Authority, added his voice to the criticism, describing the prime minister’s intervention as a PR exercise. “I am mightily worried about the politicisation of the police force. What appears on the face of it to be fairly innocuous orders – it’s a fairly short step from there to telling the police they have got to investigate this rather than that,” Bradshaw said.
Harris said: “This … is entirely predictable in terms of the ‘pulling power’ of News International on Government policy … However, his [Cameron's] intervention drives a coach and horses through the draft protocol issued by the Home Office designed to preserve the operational independence of the police.”
Writing on his blog, the peer added: “I can imagine that the senior leadership of the Metropolitan police are not exactly happy about this. It again embroils their officers in a high-profile investigation, where the chances of success are unclear, and which will divert limited investigative resources away from other matters.”
In a statement Scotland Yard denied it had been ordered to review the abduction. It said that the commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, received a request which he considered and decided on balance that it was the best course to take."

__________________

"Well Ben NEEDHAM's Mother is completely right, except that I can't see why she is pleased for the McCanns family. I can imagine this lady's FRUSTRATION when her case is real yet nothing is done any more, if she digs into the McCann case she should  be going beserk to see all that is getting deployed towards that bunch of liars whose only aim is to make and launder money.

She sould be making more noise and say that since her case happened before the McCanns, without any discrepancy to display, it should be normal that Scotland Yard goes investigate for Ben FIRST.

By the way, regarding the McCanns, why don't Scotland Yard begin with waiting til the court in Portugal this summer? There should actually be a court in Portugal to bring a prosecution to the McCanns, since their refusal to cooperate with the police (reconstitution, health records and all), without waiting til these start suing Amaral AGAIN, and Amaral having to use that opportunity to ask them key questions - in his defense...

If there was a normal court for any case where 'key witnesses' behave in a suspectful way, all based on police solid background, would not this save a lot of time and money?

Ben Needham's mum was never a suspect and she always fully cooperated with the police in both countries. We never saw her fussing out loud to criticise anyone, nor refuse to provide documents. Yet her case for her son is forgotten.

-But these crooks who are breaking our ears with their LIES since 2007 manage to get all the attention - and now taxpayers' millions."

Source: internet chat I have spotted earlier this morning.

Obviously, it pays to write a book including 'Please God' and nitty-gritty bits about a little child's genital parts.

_________________________

http://www.helpfindben.co.uk/investigation.html

_____________

"Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap' "By The Telegraph Online UK Press

"Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears

Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.

“She died in the apartment as a result of a tragic accident and the parents simulated an abduction after failing to care of their children,” Tavares de Almeida, former chief inspector at Portimao police station during the initial months of the investigation, told the court in Lisbon.

 

“These were the conclusions of a police report signed by me on September 10 2007,” he added."

Source: The Telegraph, mainstream UK Press (online)
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/portugal/6974917/Madeleine-McCanns-death-covered-up-by-parents-who-faked-kidnap-court-hears.html
 
Since this old news article was published TWICE in a row, well over ONE YEAR LATER,  yesterday and today (please see post below), I might as well make TWO posts about it. It is THEIR headlines I am only reproducing. I have no idea why this huge media is choosing to repost these news, that were sensational, and some would say, "not very helpful to find Madeleine", when no related event but a book on pre-sale is really happening. But this must be coincidence.
Has any marketing ploy become part of a huger marketing plan, by any chance? Or are there some concerned people out there, concerned that a case for a child is archived, with no indication that her investigation would have any good reason to get archived in the first place? The curious matter is left to anyone's guess. We can still write to the media and ask... perhaps we would get lucky enough not to receive a stereotyped letter back in our faces.
 
It reminds me that, back in 2007, I had had ENOUGH of these media that were (almost all) saying that "Madeleine McCann has been abducted, snatched from her bed in Praia Da Luz", so I massively emailed all these to ask which proof exactly they had to state this. Since they had none, it could only be disinformation - and WHY? Why do disinformation in a little child's case? was my big question to them.
I also chose to write about my incentive around a few public forums and comments spaces. Better not leave these efforts in secrecy... I think that many others joined me in the action, because a little while later, we saw some changes in the general press statements. Maddy wasn't abducted any longer. She was MISSING, difference. Only some media (the type of cheap sheetroll, with a strong odour of racism and taste of ...) were still obstinate into forcing the abduction on. Some jumped from the ditch to the fence, it was an in-between: Maddy was feared abducted. Fair enough, it's very scary to have the thought of any (of YOUR) child abducted.
Some supra-intelligent people with sheer powers like Mrs Justice HOGG were, in a vindictive passion, ordering "the abductor" to come and fall onto their knees in front of her, and confess. She PONDERED that the McCanns were "RESPONSIBLE" parents. I do not know where Mrs HOGG got her child-care diplomas from, do they sometimes come as a bonus gift with tins of sardines? Because, Mrs HOGG, you see, I never knew that an attitude like this of the McCanns in matter of parenting, can EVER be considered as responsible.
 
So Ok, according to you, Mrs Justice HOGG, they WERE responsible, and Madeleine WAS abducted. She became your "child of Justice" with a WOC. Had you meant a WACK in the poor child's face, you would have done even better, because where are you now? What do you do for Madeleine, exactly? Are you aware of the seriousness, heaviness of HER situation? They were responsible, doing organised child neglect, she was abducted, because they were so responsible, it makes great sense. Your protected parent (the female of them) was writing a diary, where she stated a few things that surely would catch your attention, like the mentioning of paedophiles that want to make HER tear her OWN skin off, but after this, Mrs HOGG, did you see the sort of photos that they were publicly posting? Feared abducted, Madeleine McCann, three years old, WACKED with MAKE-UP. Is this wise you think, for a potential paedophile raptor?
Child-care, you said? Of which kind, may I ask?

So, Mrs Hogg, Mr Cameron, Mr Brown, Mr Blair, Mr Mitchell, Mr Kennedy, Mr Murdoch, Mr Magalhaes e Menezes, now you can all tell us: where is the case for this Little Child, MADELEINE MCCANN, going?
 Do you have a conscience? If not, as we suspect, at least you do have a job the RESPONSIBILITIES of which you have to fulfill.
A PUBLIC job means PUBLIC DUTIES, before private profits.
Or BE more honest: what is the wider agenda? Any thought for the TRUTH and the JUSTICE for this little person? Start by doing what you're best at: your JOB, by the basics, instead of taking the money and laughing your face off Madeleine. Try JUSTICE if you do justice. Try CARE if you really care. And try reporting on the TRUTH if you own newspapers. But STOP messing us all around like that, because we seriously are saturated with your putrefied food, it leaves a bitter taste in our mouths. And some spirits above are getting REALLY over agitated.