Freedom Of Information Quest Act (FOIA) to Leicestershire Police:
Response at last... due to the investigation being "on-going" no detail can be provided:
View it on You Tube
Screen-Captures of Google Document (where response was contained):
-note: this response was received on the 3rd June 2011 whereas is dated from the 20th May 2011-
View it on You Tube
Screen-Captures of Google Document (where response was contained):
-note: this response was received on the 3rd June 2011 whereas is dated from the 20th May 2011-
Quest-Letter to Leicester Police - copy with added font styles:
to Leicester Police 28 April 2011:
Sender's details at the bottom - date: 27th April 2011
OBJECT: FOIA REQUEST TO LEICESTER POLICE, ENGLAND
SUBJECT: MCCANN CASE, INTERFERENCE BY BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND POLICE IN THE FAVOUR OF TWO EX MAIN SUSPECTS, AND UNSUPPORTED ACTION (in evidence) THAT MISLEAD INTERPOL VIA Police Officer Mr JOHN SHORD
-and other issues related to the case
Dear Madam, or, Dear Sir,
As I am interested in the Madeleine McCann case, I have come across this document and article, on which the described actions had taken many countries' police bodies into different directions, using a consirable amount of time and money -as ALL bodies were mobilised by Interpol, solely upon the alert risen by the British police, as the document and press article extract show below.
As I have searched further, I have realised that this precise part of investigation, soon discarded by the Portuguese Police [P.J.], had also come to a dead end since Interpol closed this particular investigation after 2 months of vain efforts.
Like many people, I have always, since the 3rd May 2007, been concerned as to what has really happened to this child, so upon these precise facts I am wondering what exactly had caused such havoc, vain efforts, pulling of huge organisation among the Interpol to follow a track hat was taken so seriously by the British police (Leicester). The normality demands that to take such a decisive step (following one track or another, if the wrong one then the Investigation can be seriously hindered and damaged, with wasted time and resources, as the case here) implies having a solid back-up in EVIDENCE.
Since that the matter is public (the PJ files are public since July 2008 and the British media have always been asked to publicise every detail in the case, much of the British police work being also public - like with this present document or the McCanns' "Leaving No Stone Unturned" unlimited company - fund also being public on the ground that it is entirely relying on public donations), I am asking to know which evidence was/were followed in this decision.
There is mention of a PHOTOGRAPH that a "stranger-abductor" HAS taken of the Child Madeleine McCann. Now this is written in black upon white in the British police files (see attached photograph-document), therefore I have been looking for it in an extensive internet search, thinking that the British police must have made this public by now, etc.
The mentioned photograph , if it ever existed, would have NO PRIVATE characteristic, since it is supposed to have been taken in the open, by a stranger (stranger to the McCanns couple, parents of Madeleine McCann), 3 days before the Child went missing. - or if else, the public (like myself) would like to know what exactly the photo is about.
But, I cannot find, anywhere, any such photo, nor any proof of what was so seriously stated, on any Belgian paedophile ring with elements of Madeleine's whereabouts or temporarily presence, on the demonstration that this was to be taken "to the letter",
or the evidence that the alleged photo WAS taken 3 days before Maddie's missing/ sad event,
or on the proof that a stranger was taking photographs of random/targetted children in public places. I have children too so I think it is reasonnable to enquire about this, as entitled BY LAW to some clear information in these matters.
-I do not see, either, hence I am asking WHY no information is available regarding the following matters, by the present letter:
- any official reporting to the local police by the parents who did state that their child was photographed by stranger(s) PREVIOUS TO THE "MISSING" DAY. (The McCanns never reported this but said it to the press first a while after...)
- any process towards these parents who, despite this imminent "danger", still left their 3 children under the age of three UNATTENDED in a holiday flat abroad, with an unlocked door.
- any process towards these parents who admitted having taken a forbidden substance to Portugal: CALPOL (CALPOL is not permitted there), and did not immediately request a medical test on Madeleine's siblings while suspecting that all their three children may have been "drugged-up by the abductor(s)".
- any process/other action to try or test/investigate the accusations stated by a lady doctor, (former?) friend of the McCanns / social circle: Mrs Gaspar, regarding Mr David Payne and Gerald McCann, involving talks, codes and gestures of a paedophile nature. Mr Gerald McCann, whom I repeat IS involved in these accusations, is a PUBLIC NHS practionner, therefore the public, and myself included, are wholy entitled to know the truth in this alarming matter.
- a complete investigation towards the PUBLIC FUND (www.findmadeleine.com).
I therefore require the right to know -and see- the evidence I have mentioned in the first part of this mail, and secondly, to know why the investigation was in such an obvious way mislead, and thirdly, to know why the facts, crimes and accusations, which are all very worrying for parents in general, and which are listed in the last part of this present letter, have not be dealt with the standard way in the British and Portuguese procedures. The fact that I want to see clear information in these matters implies that a proper, appropriate, efficient, competent and satisfying investigation gets - at last- conducted, regardless of the Portuguese decision of archiving the case. Many of these points can legally be dealt in England so I cannot understand why they are still not, and am demanding that all gets investigated in a normal, standard way as soon as possible, in the Name of Madeleine Beth McCann and All the other Children in this country.
Also, what were Control Risk and the Bell Pottinger Group (which specialises in Reputation Management!) doing there in Praia Da Luz, HELPING THE MCCANNS,- and so early? -within the first day after the "abduction". Why did the McCanns need REPUTATION SPECIALISTS to protect themselves? This did nothing to look for the Child of her "abductor(s)". These groups were from the UK so again an in-depth investigation is needed in this matter. Will it happen? Will the public know about it?
THIS is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read from a police officer and I demand that Mr SHORD explains it: "Met officer John Shord wrote the email to Leicestershire Police on March 4 which was passed on to Operation Task – the British end of the investigation into Madeleine McCann.
It said: "Intelligence suggests that a paedophile ring in Belgium made an order for a young girl three days before Madeleine McCann was taken.
"Somebody connected to this group saw Maddie, took a photograph of her and sent it to Belgium. The purchaser agreed that the girl was suitable and Maddie was taken." DC John Hughes, from Leicestershire Police, forwarded the email to the Policia Judiciaria (PJ) at Portimao in the Algarve on April 21, the files showed.
+ this info is on the Leicester Police File photocopy / copy too here-attached in a photo-link.
How could any intelligent, trained officer in the high police STATE without proof that "therefore she was taken" and.... all the rest. It's obvious to a large majority of people that it is the McCanns themselves who have decided to implant this invention from the start into Mr J. SHORD's mind and possibly they had connection previous to this case??? In any case it is malpractice. I want to know why such malpractice has been done and tolerated without a check. I do not need any play on words or jest explanations thank you or I will do the necessary for the truth to emerge, AS IT IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST WITH THE FIND MADELEINE FUND.
How could any intelligent, trained officer in the high police STATE without proof that "therefore she was taken" and.... all the rest. It's obvious to a large majority of people that it is the McCanns themselves who have decided to implant this invention from the start into Mr J. SHORD's mind and possibly they had connection previous to this case??? In any case it is malpractice. I want to know why such malpractice has been done and tolerated without a check. I do not need any play on words or jest explanations thank you or I will do the necessary for the truth to emerge, AS IT IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST WITH THE FIND MADELEINE FUND.
Yours sincerely,
Name. [ removed for blog publishing] (my details are printed in the end of this mail, after the copy of the document and part of article.)
Part Copy:
British police were told that Madeleine McCann was snatched by an international paedophile ring which photographed her three days before she vanished, police files have disclosed.
Photo-Caption: "This is the full email sent by an intelligence officer on the Met's vice squad on March 4 this year to counterparts in the Portuguese and Leicestershire police
By Caroline Gammell in Portimao 9:13PM BST 06 Aug 2008
"According to an email sent by the Metropolitan Police a child abduction ring based in Belgium placed an order for a "young girl".
Three-year-old Madeleine was spotted while on holiday in Portugal by someone connected to the gang who took a picture of her.
The photograph was sent back to Belgium where the paedophile ring agreed that she should be abducted, the email states.
Three days later on May 3rd last year Madeleine was taken from her family's holiday apartment in Praia da Luz in the Algarve while her parents ate at a nearby restaurant.
The astonishing revelation supports Kate and Gerry McCann's long-held theory that their eldest child may have been taken by a child smuggling ring." [Source: main stream UK press]" -PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT and press link above in my letter, thank you.
Kind regards,
from: Sender's details [withdrawn for blog publishing]
Sent via link: http://www.leics.police.uk/freedom/8_how_to_obtain_information
~~~~~
The Previous History Of The Quest For The Holy Grail:
The FOI quest has not been answered in the details, but advice was given to address the questions to Leicester Police.
This is not really understandable or "satisfying" as the Commonweath and Foreign Office Freedom of Information Department had been refered as the place to place this FOI quest for this matter, by the Justice Department (Ministry Of Justice, England). Why then didn't the Ministry Of Justice refer the enquirer to Leicester Police in the first place, or the quest itself to Leicester Police straight away? Don't they know how to do their jobs? It took enough time just to redirect the Quest, twice! as we can see below.
Why did none of these bodies NOT feel that these questions (as listed below) were of interest for a Child, therefore taking the incentive to ask the Leicester Police or The PJ (Portuguese police body who is is charge of the matter) themselves -as this would certainly have more impact- would have been, in my opinion, the right thing to do?
Here is a screen-capture of the original document reply by the Commonweath and Foreign Office Freedom of Information Department:"
"As we can see it is yet another time redirected (as advised to) the Leicester Police this time. [note from blogger: Click on the image to see the text more clearly.] Please feel free to do what you wish with this quest, share it, ask your own questions now that we at last know where to address them, and if you are in Portugal or anywhere else and can speak Portuguese/ get your question or these translated, feel free to address them to PJ too."
___________________
I am now printing the links that we can see in the image:
http://www.leics.police.uk/
"see the following link relating to making a FOIA request:" http://www.leics.police.uk/freedom/8_how_to_obtain_information
__________
FOI quest re MCCANN case
25. February 2011
-----------from forwarded message, sender's update:---------------
The exact address to send a FOI quest in this case is: (according to the Justice department at the Ministry Of Justice, England)
dp-foi.img@fco.gov.uk
At: Commonweath and Foreign Office Freedom of Information Department
Details of the email response:
"Thank you for your emails of 31 January to the Ministry of Justice and 25 February to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office about the case of Madeleine McCann. Please accept my apologies for the length of time it has taken to respond. general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk
I can confirm that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has now received both correspondences. We are currently preparing a reply and will be in contact in due course.
Regards
Robert
Rob Lindsay
Consular Assistance
Consular Directorate
Foreign & Commonwealth Office
WH.4.9
King Charles Street
London SW1A 2PA
email: robert.lindsay@fco.gov.uk
tel: 020 7008 0402
ftn: 8008 0402
url: www.fco.gov.uk "
_________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL QUEST, From 31. January 2011:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 31 January 2011 15:16
Subject: Right of Information -Act- re Madeleine McCann Case.Attachment. Query:
To:
Dear Madam, or, Dear Sir,
As I am interested in the Madeleine McCann case, I have come across this document and articles again, which at the time had taken many countries' police bodies into different directions, using consirable amount of time and money.
As I have searched further, I have realised that this precise part of investigation, soon discarded by the Portuguese Police PJ, had also come to a dead end since Interpol closed this particular investigation after 2 months of efforts.
As many people I have always, since the 3rd May 2007, been concerned as to what has really happened to this child, so when I could get this reminder of facts I have wondered what exactly had caused such havoc, vain efforts, pulling of huge organisation among the Interpol to follow a track hat was taken so seriously by the British police (Leicester). The normality demands that to take such a decisive step (following one track or another, if the wrong one then the Investigation can be seriously hindered and damaged, with wasted time and resources, as the case here) implies having a solid back-up in EVIDENCE.
Since that the matter is public (the PJ files are public and the British media have always been asked to publicise every detail in the case, much of the British police work being also public - like with this present document or the "rogatory interviews"), I am asking to know which evidence was/were followed in this decision. There is mention of a PHOTOGRAPH that a "stranger-abductor" HAS taken of the Child Madeleine McCann. Now this is written in black upon white in the British police files (see pasted and attached photo-document), therefore I have been looking for it in an extensive internet search, thinking that the British police must have made this public by now.
The mentioned photograph has NO PRIVATE characteristic. It is supposed to have been taken in the open, 3 days before the Child went missing.
But, I cannot find, anywhere, any such photo, nor any proof of what was so seriously stated, a Belgian paedophile ring with elements of Madeleine's whereabouts or temporarily presence, the demonstration that this was to be taken "to the letter", the evidence that the alleged photo WAS taken 3 days before Maddie's missing sad event, the proof that a stranger was taking photographs of random/targetted children in public places.
I do not see, either:
an official reporting to the local police by the parents who did state that their child was photographed by stranger(s) PREVIOUS TO THE MISSING DAY.
a process towards these parents who, despite this imminent "danger", still left their 3 children under the age of three UNATTENDED in a holiday flat abroad, with an unlocked door.
a process towards these parents who admitted having taken a forbidden substance to Portugal: CALPOL (CALPOL is not permitted there).
a process to try the accusations stated by a couple of doctors: the Gaspars, regarding Mr David Payne and Gerald McCann, involving talks, codes and gestures of a paedophile nature.
a complete investigation towards the PUBLIC FUND (www.findmadeleine.com).
I therefore require the right to know -and see- the evidence I have mentioned in the first part of this mail, and secondly, to know why the investigation was in such an obvious way sabotaged, and thirdly, to know why the crimes and accusations I am listing in the last part of this present letter have not be dealt with the standard way in the British and Portuguese procedures.
Yours sincerely,
(my details are printed in the end of this mail, after the copy of the document and part of article.)
Copy:
British police were told that Madeleine McCann was snatched by an international paedophile ring which photographed her three days before she vanished, police files have disclosed.
This is the full email sent by an intelligence officer on the Met's vice squad on March 4 this year to counterparts in the Portuguese and Leicestershire police
By Caroline Gammell in Portimao 9:13PM BST 06 Aug 2008
According to an email sent by the Metropolitan Police a child abduction ring based in Belgium placed an order for a "young girl".
Three-year-old Madeleine was spotted while on holiday in Portugal by someone connected to the gang who took a picture of her.
The photograph was sent back to Belgium where the paedophile ring agreed that she should be abducted, the email states.
Three days later on May 3rd last year Madeleine was taken from her family's holiday apartment in Praia da Luz in the Algarve while her parents ate at a nearby restaurant.
The astonishing revelation supports Kate and Gerry McCann's long-held theory that their eldest child may have been taken by a child smuggling ring. " -endQuote-
The photograph was sent back to Belgium where the paedophile ring agreed that she should be abducted, the email states.
Three days later on May 3rd last year Madeleine was taken from her family's holiday apartment in Praia da Luz in the Algarve while her parents ate at a nearby restaurant.
The astonishing revelation supports Kate and Gerry McCann's long-held theory that their eldest child may have been taken by a child smuggling ring. " -endQuote-
Publishing shared Enquirer's reply to Foreign And Commonwealth Office re their final reply - see above on the blog for details, "Update 26.March 2011":
ReplyDeleteDear Louise Edwards,
Thank you for this reply and attachment. I do wonder why this wouldn't be a matter of concern for the Ministry of Justice or the Foreign & Commonwealth Office. Many points can be considered by both these departments, as the Interpol incentive to investigate from "a photograph taken of Madeleine McCann" originated from a Leicester police staff, with no apparent proof of it, so really why do I have to ask these questions which are in Madeleine's interest and in the public interest, when it's the job of these here-mentioned bodies to do so?
The question about the private FUND is also a matter of British Justice - who refered me to you, as you must know, therefore it is a matter for the Foreign & Commonwealth Office too, logically.
Also why didn't the Justice department or the the Foreign & Commonwealth Office direct me to Leicester police earlier? And if possible, can you (and are "you" not legally bound to) ask these questions "yourself" (no offense intended, dear Louise Edwards, as I do not mean this at personal level) to the Portuguese and the Leicester police relevant departments?
If "you" did so, it would have more impact and then the case for this poor little Child who have a better chance to step off its archiving status.
Thank you for considering my reply and for forwarding it to the relevant departments and staff with the respective responsibility in the matter,
Kind regards,
[name withdrawn for present publication]
I apologise for the irregular font colours in this blog-post, no matter what I do while editing, the result keeps getting messed, anyway please feel to comment on this:
ReplyDeleteThe email was sent by DS John Shord to DS John Hughes Leicestershire Police HQ, whom then forwarded it to the PJ, but no evidence or other official documentation accompanied the email, which upon reflection surgests that this email was a total fabrication by DS John Hughes in an attempt to sabotarge the Portugese Authroities investigation and to divert suspicion from the McCann's... so why would a UK cop deliberately sabotarge the Potugese investigation and send them on a wild goose chase to protect the McCann's, and from what crime did the Mccann's need escapeing from via DS John Shord's missuse of his power and also perverting the course of Justice?
ReplyDeleteThis email certainly dose not destroy the PJ's theory that the couple accidentally killed Madeleine and then tried to dispose of her body, as the email was soley based on the hearsay of DS John Huges, there was no evidance whatsoever with which to substantiate the claim's in that email made by DS Hughes!
Hi Ka, everything is in your comment, my reactions so exactly, and curiously the only ones claiming this initially were the McCanns. Are they friends with anyone at Leicester Police by any chance?
ReplyDeleteAnother question worth asking is who exactly set the Interpol on something that had no basis, no evidence whatsoever? Last night I was reading 2 versions, one article was saying that LP did, another one PJ... Another thing that ALL articles were stating was: evidence was asked by PJ, but could never be obtained! LP kept saying there was NO support-document to it!!!
-and then plenty people DARED blaming the PJ for not investigating that!!!! I saw that in many blogs and comments, so I now wish that they read this blog The Lost Marketing Ploy.
Why did Interpol ever accepted to work on a flimsy track without demanding the proof for it? It's every tax-payer's money that has been misused, so we should all make a claim so that the culprit for this mistake must refund this money, ah ah ah, if the McCanns -as it really looks- then the book profits + the fund can be seized, and good bye blue sky!
-but it's not the first time we see perverting the court of justice by the McCanns, is it? Why did they get away with the lies in the first day, regarding the window and the shutter, that they described as damaged to others, as reported in the press widely and that was quoting the words of different people -just upon that, the police should have said, "Right big ears, what have we got here?!" lol, yes they had 2 liars and child-neglectors in front of them but were ordered by the high-money-mafia to give them special treatment. Corrupted governments, that makes me sick!
That email sent by DS John Shord was a complete scam, just cause he was working in the Met police dosn't make an email from him to Leicestershire police claiming that Madeleine was abducted to order by a Belgium paedo ring following someone taking a photo of her any way legit if he never followed correct proceedure by sending the email with evidence, it's just an email with no evidence to back it up with, complete hearsay, bollocks, fake, a load of lies, and from a public tax paid cop too!
ReplyDeleteThere's another thing too, the two Control Risk Group officers that the McCann's employed from just 6 day's following their claim of abduction that took Jane Tanner in a white van to identify Murat, also worked in the fraud depeartment of the Met police for year's, so there's definately a link between DS John Shord that sent that email and the McCann's via Control Risk Group, and reflecting on this information, it's leading me to the Mccann's fake chairty fund being a front for a money laundering outfit, not only from donations by the public, but also on the inside of the public law enforcement as regards to public taxes, cause just one letter from them to the Portugese Judicia would reopen the case, they don't need a petition with people's name's on it, it's all a scam to throw public tax payers money into one of the biggest fraud cases on the planet, cause I wouldn't sign their pathetic petition to reopen the case, they should just answer the 48 questions instead, that would officially reopen the case, and nothings stopping them doing that, so what's the petititon for if they don't really need one to reopen the case with anyway, unless it was to get evereyone's IP addresses, identitys, and worm into their computers for their credit card details!
I bet there's a lot of records and paperwork in the Met police that directly links DS John Shord with those two Control Risk Group officers the Mccann's employed to search for their daughter, especially that Control Risk Group dosn't have any previous experience in missing persons or children, but only in fraud, money laundering and corperate theft!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.madeleinefoundation.org.uk/Investigators.html
But were Control Risks Group already involved at least 12 days before Dr Gerald McCann made his claim on the BBC that ‘the advice we have received is that private investigations will not help at the moment’? It seems that they were.
For in the early afternoon of Sunday 13 May 2007, Jane Tanner, one of the McCanns’ friends and the person who says she saw an abdcutor, spoke to ‘some of the people that Kate and Gerry brought in’. Who were these ‘people’ brought in by Dr Gerald and Dr Kate McCann?
It is almost certain that they were two senior investigators from Control Risks Group, namely Kenneth Farrow and Michael Keenan. Mr Farrow is the ex-head of the Economic Crime Unit in the City of London Police and Mr Keenan an ex-Superintendent from the Metropolitan Police with specialist fraud and investigative experience.
Hi Ka, excellent points as usual! ;-}
ReplyDelete___
Well well well shall a lot of readers take all this and send a FOI request to the BRITISH SOCIAL SERVICES instead? I feel it would be more efficient than to LP....safer too if more than one individual sends it...
... as I truly fear for the mental well-being of Sean and Amelie in the meanwhile.
I doubt if a lot of readers would actually put pen to paper a FOI request to anyone these days, the majority of the British public are more interested in their football and a fridge full of beer cans, such is the world of Punch & Judy with an A.D.H.D. kid doing daddy's work of beating up their mother's so daddy feel's proud of himself, if you know what I mean?
ReplyDeleteAs far as Amelie and Sean are concerned, I wonder if the real mothers of those two kids knows that their adopted parents are the McCann's?
Megafundline said...
ReplyDeleteThat's what you can call "Clearing the ground before your feet" eh?! I'd laugh if it wasn't so damning frustrating.
So OK if I lived in Leicestershire and need to see a GP or for my family, am I not entitled that the ALLEGATIONS regarding an incident of a PAEDOPHILE nature get fully investigated concerning, directly, 2 NHS DOCTORS? DOCTORS MCCANN and PAYNE are directly accused of behaving like PAEDOS here, by the GASPARS Doctors, and the public isn't entitled to know if any investigation was done about it? Nor, if the case, to see the results? Are we to ASSUME anything in this country, forever stuck in a pseudo-rosy-glittery fairy tale?!
-and if Gerry is innocent of these allegations, I am sure he would understand why I find it normal to have this very puzzling point investigated! As usual there is nothing personal in my comments or blog-posts, I just want the truth about it - to "eliminate" Gerry from this sort of suspicion, ;) - seriously this is what I feel. I can't see why this aspect of the investigation shouldbe wrapped in secrecy... Or has secrecy become a very convenient fashion now?
We should PETITION about it, it gets me fuming, AND I am not a "hater-nutter", sorry to have to clear this point Ms HEALY, but I think the worse HATER is YOU, PLUS you are BLIND! Because you put everybody in the same bag (no puns intended...) meaning that you generalise. You don't believe it was an abduction? You're a certified NUTTER! Kate, kate.... is it true you were JEALOUS of Madeleine because her Dad was showing her a lot of love?
No matter what it is, both you K&G are sooner or later be compelled to explain in COURT why you LIED... and you DID... The Met Boys have done a brilliant start already, finding you very probably STAGED the abduction...
------AND KA OSSIS is 100% RIGHT, we should ALSO PETITION to DEMAND that the future results of the CASE REVIEW £3.5 MILLIONS by the MET SHOULD be made PUBLIC! In the name oof WHAT will it NOT be PUBLIC? THE PUBLIC FEEDS THE FUND! MCCANN IS A PUBLIC DOCTOR! His wife writes publicly about her version "of the truth"! So whatever will transpire here, from this special investigation - where CHILD HOMICIDE UNIT is involved!- should be CLEAR, OPEN, without a shroud of DARK SECRECY! Here we go again, a new, planned secrecy now! Gosh it's become VIRAL...
Is this case is ANY EXCUSE TO FATTEN RICH PERSONS' POCKETS, (whose atitude to ignore things like the Gaspars' statements and the SEMEN stain , DUBIOUS, for the least!)? as long as they are churchy, mates with the PARTY NWO, and a few doctors and solicitors ?! And Katie you should get back to work where you belong, no qualified doctor should be allowed to be on a permanent holiday - lazy person - so often seen holding a glass of wine on your "book" photos and else, even when carrying "Madeleine"!
(Did you KILL Madeleine in "an act of madness"?)
Megafundline said...
ReplyDeleteThat's what you can call "Clearing the ground before your feet" eh?! I'd laugh if it wasn't so damning frustrating.
So OK if I lived in Leicestershire and need to see a GP or for my family, am I not entitled that the ALLEGATIONS regarding an incident of a PAEDOPHILE nature get fully investigated concerning, directly, 2 NHS DOCTORS? DOCTORS MCCANN and PAYNE are directly accused of behaving like PAEDOS here, by the GASPARS Doctors, and the public isn't entitled to know if any investigation was done about it? Nor, if the case, to see the results? Are we to ASSUME anything in this country, forever stuck in a pseudo-rosy-glittery fairy tale?!
-and if Gerry is innocent of these allegations, I am sure he would understand why I find it normal to have this very puzzling point investigated! As usual there is nothing personal in my comments or blog-posts, I just want the truth about it - to "eliminate" Gerry from this sort of suspicion, ;) - seriously this is what I feel. I can't see why this aspect of the investigation shouldbe wrapped in secrecy... Or has secrecy become a very convenient fashion now?
We should PETITION about it, it gets me fuming, AND I am not a "hater-nutter", sorry to have to clear this point Ms HEALY, but I think the worse HATER is YOU, PLUS you are BLIND! Because you put everybody in the same bag (no puns intended...) meaning that you generalise. You don't believe it was an abduction? You're a certified NUTTER! Kate, kate.... is it true you were JEALOUS of Madeleine because her Dad was showing her a lot of love?
No matter what it is, both you K&G are sooner or later be compelled to explain in COURT why you LIED... and you DID... The Met Boys have done a brilliant start already, finding you very probably STAGED the abduction...
------AND KA OSSIS is 100% RIGHT, we should ALSO PETITION to DEMAND that the future results of the CASE REVIEW £3.5 MILLIONS by the MET SHOULD be made PUBLIC! In the name oof WHAT will it NOT be PUBLIC? THE PUBLIC FEEDS THE FUND! MCCANN IS A PUBLIC DOCTOR! His wife writes publicly about her version "of the truth"! So whatever will transpire here, from this special investigation - where CHILD HOMICIDE UNIT is involved!- should be CLEAR, OPEN, without a shroud of DARK SECRECY! Here we go again, a new, planned secrecy now! Gosh it's become VIRAL...
Is this case is ANY EXCUSE TO FATTEN RICH PERSONS' POCKETS, (whose atitude to ignore things like the Gaspars' statements and the SEMEN stain , DUBIOUS, for the least!)? as long as they are churchy, mates with the PARTY NWO, and a few doctors and solicitors ?! And Katie you should get back to work where you belong, no qualified doctor should be allowed to be on a permanent holiday - lazy person - so often seen holding a glass of wine on your "book" photos and else, even when carrying "Madeleine"!
(Did you KILL Madeleine in "an act of madness"?)
Perfect little genitals ??????????/ WTF
ReplyDeleteKATE MCCANN GET HELP URGENTLY , YOU ARE SO SICK AND DISGUSTING. NOT EVEN THE EQUALLY DISGUSTING " THE SUN " PRINTED YOUR VILE SICK THOUGHTS. YOUR POOR TWINS. WHAT THEY HAVE TO ENDURE WHEN THEY ARE OLDER AND READ YOUR FILTH. YOU NEED HELP. POOR MADELEINE , GONE FOREVER AND YOU LIVING OFF HER MISERY... DISGUSTING. YOU ARE EVIL PERSONIFIED. LOTS OF PEOPLE ARE SAYING YOU ONLY PUT THAT IN TO MAKE PEOPLE DIG DEEP INTO THEIR POCKEYS FOR FAKE FUND. HOW LOW ARE YOU GOING TO GO ? I THOUGHT YOU WENT TOO FAR WITH MAKE UP PICTURE BUT THIS .... YOU HAVE ONE SICK MIND. I DOUBT VERY MUCH THE TWINS WOULD WANT TO READ ABOUT MUM AND DADS SEX LIFE. WHAT ARE YOU EXPOSING YOUR CHILDREN TO WITHIN YOUR HOME ? SOCIAL SERVICES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATING YOUR SICK MIND.. YOU ARE A VERY DERANGED WOMAN...... SICKENING TO THE CORE.
BY THE WAY ? ARE YOU BOTH DOCTORS ? THAT YOU COULD NOT COPE WITH COLIC OR NO ITS SYMPTOMS ? THANK GOODNESS YOU ARE NOT AN ACTING GP ..... THAT IS FRIGHTENING. YOU BOTH SHOULD BE STRUCK OFF AT ONCE.
ReplyDeleteThank you Anonymous for these relevant comments. How can the social services ignore such a sick book now, that Kate admits has been written for the TWINS (The Express, once again sack Maddy....), strange language for kids, strange images of paedophile nature, strange state of mind...How can they ignore this?
ReplyDeleteWhy can't they also see that the McCanns called a GP straight away after their hasty return from the "third world country from hell", in order to quickly be assessed by a social worker, "to pre-empt", as Kate confesses?!
CALLING A GP? Who really needs a GP when they are both doctors? And as you say, strange for them to let Maddy suffer from "colic" for 18 months... are they doctors, at all? The way Kate describes very fast her studies...well Ms Healy, I am graduated from a University, have the NARIC equivalence of a B.A., and somehow I don't fall for your narration.
It's VERY hard to study at any university , adapt, constantly move on to further topics having had to assimilate the previous, and keep up with all the work, constant attention, keeping a cool head (so if you Hot Lips Healy had a clear tendency to go heavy on the parties, the drinks and all, how could you keep a cool head? it's ALL you mention about the first part of your "studies"! Funny as well as you make a point mention that club that offered special nights for Doctors and Nurses only... did you take that shortcut to marry a doctor, really? while studying ballet-dancing? hee hee), not to mention the stress of the exams and other tests. In fact you're constantly assessed, formally or informally. You have to show you behave a responsible way and be open, sociable and presentable.
Some students drop, too much tension, some end up at their GP's asking for energisers or anti-depressants.
While my mates were getting married, starting a mortgage and a family, I was there in my twenties still studying like mad to secure my Degree. If I was to write a book and include that bit of my life, would I sound like the little nymphomaniac light party girl like you describe? or on the opposite like a young adult who was conscient to be making a lot of sacrifices and drastic choices to try and make it? You don't give me the second option impression, at all. All is too easy-rosy in your book, when it comes to your studies and career start on Chapter 1 - titled "Gerry"...
And you paint Gerry as a womaniser. Oh he was a king in sports. A conscientious doctor or a binger who doesn't give a fuck if his kids are left to do what they want in a flat at LEAST 80 steps away at night, unlocked etc. (and give over with the "crow's flight"! Bloody hell do you FLY too? Or did you SWIM across the pool to get faster?!)
Look at me I'm Mr Tennisman. I am the Researcher Doctor, you see! I play like a beast when my kid is... where? My trainers are made for jogging. Why bother searching the ground, these idiots at the Swarthy Sardine Police have covered it all for ME. I play golf so what you internet nutters? Mind your own business and "FUCK OFF".
You're all only good when you pity us and call Maddy MAHHHDELEINE. -and fill up our precious Fund.
You know what Gerry? My turn to say FUCK OFF.
I spare YOU -and ou All, ;-}, the rest or I'd end-up writing a BOOK that you would try to BAN about that lousy, snobbish LOT. I hope that the "fucking tosser" Ricardo Paiva DOES have yours banned.
Kate and Gerry are not Doctors Mega. They are a pair of " fuckin tossers, fuckin tossers. fuckin tossers " ( ALL CHANT NOW , CHANT CHANT CHANT , JOIN IN EVERYBODY ) fuckin tossers fuckin tossers. I think they got their qualifications from a lucky bag or something. More like a pair of con merchants with their fake charity , i mean reg COMPANY / CHANT NOW ..... fuckin tossers ,
ReplyDeleteYou can't SPAM us. LOL LOL LOL
ReplyDeleteWhat's up ? Does the truth hurt
Oneday the TRUTH will out.
The care or should I say - the lack of was disgusting. Doctord ...... Bleugh cough cough
Sickening.
The McCanns by sticking their guilty faces on the Leveson inquiry are trying to clear their names. What happened in Praia De Luz as in the Jane Hill video on You Tube when asked " why as a mother did you NOT search " Kate replied - " we were incredibly busy ". What is this sick deluded woman talking about ? Her daughter is missing and they were busy ?
ReplyDeleteThe McCanns no what happened to Madeleine. It is so obvious. The McCanns are hoping to have all damning evidence wiped from the internet - why ? To protect their perfect twins. That will never happen and anyway there will always be someone who will shout out the whole sordid tale for the twins. The McCanns instead of digging a hole out of it for themselves have dug a deeper one. For the day will come when Sean and Amelie will ask " we want the truth " and that day will come soon. One thing for sure they will know if they are being lied to for you always KNOW your OWN. Poor children stuck with those vain selfish neglectful parents. I do hope social services are keeping a very close eye on the parents from a distance. Re- Gaspar statement McCann and Paynes silence is loud to my ears.
It really makes me spew, they did seem to do all to "protect the Twins" - Children I respect, by the way, who by their Innocence have nothing to do with all this. SHAME that these *parents* never protected them while going around for fancy meals and drinking binges! Somehow the Locals of Praia told the world that these "resposible parents" were seen at other venues, like he Chaplin's and The Kelly's! "Protect the twins"? What about Madeleine here????!!!! On which day was Kate phoning "a friend"... or WHOM? repeatedly, as the "MASS PING" [Mobile telephones Recording System] clearly say.
DeleteYes these phone records RELIABLE systems tell anyone who cares to look (via the police files, which are public) how Kate was using her mobile per the minute, call after call, on that STRANGE, STRANGE NIGHT of the 1st MAY 2007! The Day Of The Mayos. As Amaral writes in his Book: "I doubt Madeleine saw many Mayos on that day."! Mayos are big rag-dolls made by Locals to celebrate the First Day Of May. See the book beginning for more info. On THAT day (NIGHT) the Neighbour, JUST above this 5a flat, HEARD a little Child CRY for OVER ONE HOUR!
--this tells me that this CHILD (MADELEINE) was ON HER OWN AGAIN, CRYING FOR DADDY (NOT "mummy!"), as Mrs Fenn the WITNESS NEIGHBOUR stated she HEARD This Child call "DADDY!... DADDY!....." and CRY again, SOB, CALL AGAIN, repeatedly, for OVER ONE HOUR! After this, this witness head doors opening and shutting. The CRY STOPPED. It means that SOMEONE was FINALLY in the flat. Logically it would be the Daddy, as on that night Kate states to the police that she shortly joined her husband to 'bed'.
This is WHY, in her bloody piece of p1ss book (or "BEWK"), Mrs HEALY - NOT "MCCANN", Ms KATE the *MOTHER*) tries to take the MICK out of a DEAD Person (Coward Kate!!!! You just don't do THAT! - even if this lady was still alive when you began to write your book, she was OLD, have you NO respect?!) - and clearly described how her little friend "Fi" (the Fiona love 1) had REBUKED (told off) this lady above who was offering her Help.
-But, re the PAYNE PAEDO topic, this is also WHY we have never clearly seen them stand and refute these allegations towards Little Madeleine. I WROTE to the Social Services, UK, partly about this, guess what they replied? NOTHING. (see the post here "Letter to The Social Services" - I really should make it a PAGE....)
Yes they seemed (and CLAIM) to be REAL BUSY. They were BUSY........... cleaning the teddy cat with BLEACH cause it "smelled of suntan lotion"... Bingo Kate! You DO know how to attract the old gitts who have nothing to do but lying in the Algarve sun, asking someone to massage them with lotion... But to me it says:
1) WHAT were YOU doing on the BEACH lying like a spread-out starfish when your CHILD was missing?!
2) Why take this teddy that your CHILD cherished to that pleasant BEACH with you, and let it be sunk in LOTION?
3) Ask The Dogs, Sandra!
I think that's what the NSY are going to come back on. Madeleine was TAKEN to ORDER by at Belgium paedophile ring - CASE CLOSED.
ReplyDeleteBut we don't listen to fairy stories. Madeleine died in apt 5 A the dogs alerts are set in stone. The fancy talk they spew out about a DVD paedo ring and shootings is all total CRAP. Its to hide why the McCanns were there in Praia De Luz along with lots of NHS Doctors that suddenly upped sticks and pissed off out of there. The hapless McCanns and their baby sitting or should I say LACK of arrangements really thru a spanner in the works and OTHER things that need PROTECTING would have came out - Clarence Mitchell - DISPATCHED / UK Government intervention and special requests all for a child that is missing th neglect ? ? ? I DONT THINK SO.
Ty- latest news (6th March 2012) from Twitter (Amaral source): NSY is working with a team in Porto and this is really not god news for the "team McCann" eh eh eh
Delete- this Shord email business is neither good for the Leicester Police / whatever othe police involved in the Uk! This SHOULD get investigated as to why the BRITISH POLICE LIED IN FAVOUR OF THE MCCANNS PROTECTION?! And of course in disfavour of the Child Madeleine.
Yes god reminder Anon ;) WHY so many DOCTORS there while the McCanns were on holiday? Were they only British ones? Where can we get a link for this? Ty
Mega - I forgot to sign-in lol
I don't believe that Madeleine was snatched to order by a Belgium pardophile ring or the extreme hard core DVD paedo ring that shoots anyone that gets in the way of the child being snatched. The hapless McCanns thru their " baby sitting arrangements or should I say LACK of that gave the GAME AWAY NEARLY. Its odd how many other NHS Doctors where in that same resort and all pissed off out of it as quick as they could. Even if they had some days left of their HOLIDAY ? They scarpered like rats from a sinking ship Then right away the big guns were sent over to help the McCanns SEARCH for their daughter and the UK Government falling over themselves to aid them. What other missing child has ever had that. So what REALY IS BEING COVERED that the McCanns nearly EXPOSED with their selfish behaviour ? Has Gerry got lots of shit on them all ? Does he have constant bouts of these TUNNEL VISIONS ? When he calls your name and he got the dirt , I think the powers that be JUMP. There is MORE than just a missing child going on here. So I expect the MET to just add a few more lines onto pdophile rings that they can't trace. Yeah, we all belive in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy.
ReplyDeleteYes , good point Mega. A very good point. These so called Doctors need investigating. I for one would not let any of them near my children. The public need protecting from these awful people. These Doctors didn't care for their children at night. They were left in the apt and one is now gone probably dead. The fund needs a full investigation and every penny accounted for. Instead of it being used to sue people foe more money. Kate McCann should get off her bum and search for her own daughter instead of trying to write bewks. And I am not joking when I state that.
ReplyDeleteHiya Megafundline,
ReplyDeleteWhat a turn up for the books now that the Met has yet come out with more stories about new suspects, and a middle-aged couple that were witnessed by two people going into the McCann's apartment to 'comfort Madeleine', and none of it mentioned before! Like... How did these two supposed witnesses know that this middle-aged couple were going into the McCann's apartment to comfort Madeleine??? How did these two suposed witnesses know that Madeleine needed comforting in the first place???
We should do a new FOI request and ask the Met police how they got this info from the two witnesses, cause it seems very strange that anyone would know for sure what someone, or a couple of someone's, would be going into someone else's apartment for, extremely strange, unless the two supposed witnesses who supposedly say they saw a middle-aged couple going into the McCann's apartment are actually the middle-aged couple themselves, and then again, weren't both Kate and Gerry middle-aged in May 2007... This is yet another heap of bull from the Freemason Metropolitan police to keep the public tax payers funds going into the McCann's abduction fantasy story, same as Met Officer John Shord's fantasy story that the FOI request about the Belgium paedo ring that snatched to order from a supposed photo of Madeleine that never materialised, what a HOOO HAAAAA!
Hi, sorry All I had missed comments as sometimes I don't see notifications when emails get "drowned" in a lot of junk commercials. I appreciate reading your Comments in any case.
ReplyDeleteTo briefly answer the last one, dear Ka Ossis, yes I agree and I forever wonder why the press online always have to include this sentence: "The McCanns are PLEASED with the outcome / development / enquiry....." WOW. It seems that ALL is ever made TO please this couple who are in fact ex PRIME SUSPECTS!
I have reacted at this too, Ka Ossis: how did these new witnesses "know" that the couple wanted to "COMFORT MADELEINE"???!!!!!
There is a VOTE on the top right of every page in this blog to express agreement or disagreement over the public money spent on this "investigation" BY the British Tax Payers. So at least this way we can all have a say. I say:NO! I say: it is a very strange DEAL and people from both countries have long talked about a PACT (word that one of the Tapas "witnesses" said himself in the early stages of this case.)
Please DO this new FOI Request, it will be interesting to see what the MET replies.... While you are there ;) you could ask them why the McCanns "NEED" to be pleased by their actions all the time........ Thanks :D XXXX Mega
Very good at publishing your evil bile but exercise heavy censorship of any dissenting view. Funny that, isn't that what you've accused the McCanns of? You fucking hypocrite! Why not let me have your address and we'll discuss this face to face you evil cunt?
ReplyDeleteBut this blog doesn't censor comments - except as previously stipulated, foul language ones. So I leave your comment until YOU've seen this reply, you "brave" "Anonymous", and then yes it will be banned and you will be blocked like you fully deserve.
ReplyDeleteTLMP
Hi Ka & Mega. I'm just wondering if this blog is still active and if you have had any success with your FOI request & whether now is the time to ask LP again or is case still open? I'm so glad someone has already raised these issues, it makes me wonder how many others have too. Or we could start a petition on the gov uk site that we can then share on FB & Twitter, just need to ensure we stick to the facts & what we can ask for eg public inquiry so maybe legal advice? I wondered what you thought of Stephen Birchs new lead from late 2013 that is on YouTube in an interview with Sonia Poulton. Theres also Peter Hyatts statement analysis in one of Richard D Halls films 'Embedded Confessions' & 'When did Madeleine Die?' which analyses in depth visually the statements, maps & tests out some theories etc (4 hours long as much to cover). His sources are all the available evidence from U.K. Police & especially the PJ files, and what K&G have disclosed in interviews & the book to establish a timeline of that week but highlights the many inconsistencies - both films available on the Rich planet channel. To summarise Stephen Birch-after he trespassed (as only way he could test it) on the Murat property & used Ground Penetrating Radar on an area at the rear of the property. The results show an anomaly where the ground has been disturbed further underneath the drive & is of a size that COULD be a small child. This area has been made into a drive in November 2007 but in May that year it was a pile of rubble so would not have been able to have been checked using this method by the Portuguese police at the time in the early days of the investigation. He had the scans assessed by 5 independent witnesses that Sonia verified also & 4 were certain there is something there & advised excavation given the circumstances, the 5th was less sure about it but also advised to excavate. Stephen has sent copies of all this to the UK & Portugese authorities but to no avail-he said he was already in regular email contact with a detective in The Met but that the only response was 'How did you get the data off the radar machine & nothing since. He said the Portuguese PM stated the property had already been searched like this initially so no need to do it again. Given it is only 150 metres from the Ocean Club resort appt & accessible from the rear over a 1.5 metre fence, & the possibility of a cadaver being moved it would seem logical to at least rule out. Kate herself was asked about it on ITV This Morning Show & her response was 'yeah I know but it's not credible & I mean who is he!?'
ReplyDeletePart 2-Stephen is someone who has spent £50,000 & more since he first got involved to try find Maddy years ago then has continued to try get the truth. She also said the met had told them before in the press (Stephen says it was in over 200 worldwide but not in the U.K. & I don't recall it. I only saw his video from 3 years ago this week & your blog today so it shows how little publicity it has had in recent years. I don't think RHall knew about DS John Shords email either, thank you for publishing it & your persistence in this matter. R Halls timeline film as mine blieing the amount of mistakes changes U turns vagueness etc from a group of trained 'medical professionals' whose job is to observe & be accurate & precise.
ReplyDeletePeter Hyatt is a statement analyst in the U.S and has worked on many cases for law enforcement and the FBI, even managing to get some cases reopened and evidence or confession from suspects due to the accuracy of this scientific study of language use of verbs, tense, pro-nouns etc especially when asked questions on the spot as if it's true the memory is there, if not you have to work it out & often get it wrong. Also what you choose to talk about, & the level of detail says so much. Basically he confirmed what has been theorised, that they were involved and know she's dead following a fall or accident in the apartment (eg they ask when & how could we have done this & that etc if this happened so are telling you & checking reactions for plausibility-they did what they say they didn't but Peter can explain it better and takes a lot of studying) He actually said he was overwhelmed by the level of deception shown by them, that high indicators of both being sexually abused themselves as children & likely it was happening within the family at that time also-just to clarify I am quoting him directly & these are allegations not facts but the study is an evidence based technique- before I get sent a letter from Carter Ruck! Though this concerns me more for the other children of them & others in the group sadly. Again thanks for your hard work in uncovering this side of investigation & summarising the FOIA request, so much more coincidences happened since now...
PS. At the end of R Halls film as above it has a list of all the top CEOs & other staff at medical pharmaceutical & tech companies as well as many NHS doctors & consultants etc who wouldn't go there normally, it's like s secret meeting but you'd think choose a city to blend in & not a resort out of season. The only thing I Can thinknif that year was the treaty of Lisbon inviting 10 more countries into EU & solidifying EU human rights laws superced any countries own but you'd think that'd be politicians rather than these folk. Who knows!?
Sorry me again! From looking at that Telegraph article about the phot/order thing I then saw another story about Chuef Constsble of Leicester police & 2 West Midlands officers all suspended whilst under investigation, along with a member of the public too, for serious fraud involving property overseas. Just wondering if that could be any of our friends...
ReplyDelete