Please note that although several days have passed since this blog post was translated from the article in Lux and published by J. Morais, an Internet search for the matter (today via Google) has only led to this link. The recent news has NOT been reported by any online main-stream media in English language.
It is curious as anything which is even indirectly connected with the McCann case, when it appears to be in the favour of Madeleine McCann's parents, "normally" makes the front lines in the UK... But since when aren't the British media interested in reporting about a murdered Child? Have they chosen to BLANK the new FACTS in a world-known Child Case, precisely BECAUSE, this time, it might NOT be looking too well for the "famous" pair whom they usually clearly protect and pamper? (and I even add an exclamation mark or two: !!) Hasn't cowardice and obedience led these so-called journalists to frankly drop from their responsibilities?! Media, you have an OBLIGATION to report news and facts; Media: we don't trust in you any longer. Your game is blatant now: you have played the wrong card. You have proven how biased you are, and how devious too. You are ONE-sided.
For if we remember a few things...
Excerpt from J. Morais' translation of the press report for the recent court judgement regarding Leonor Cipriano:
"The Court of Faro condemned today Leonor Cipriano to seven more months in jail for making false accusations in the process which incriminated five Judiciary Police officers of the crimes of aggression and torture.
This jail sentence is added to the 16 years that the arguida is serving for the murder of her daughter Joana - who disappeared from the village of Figueira, in Portimão, on September 12 2004 - and of which she has served about half.
According to the court, it was proved that Leonor Cipriano lied about the way in which the officers had beaten her, having presented in trial different versions of the facts that took place during the questionings to which she was subjected to, in 2004, after the crime.
According to the judge who delivered the judgement today, despite not having taken oath, the arguida in the quality of assistant to the process, was warned that she could not misrepresent the truth, at the risk of being punished and if she had done it, she did it "because she wanted" and in a conscient manner." Read more here...
More facts about the "Joana Case"...