Jim Gamble Put Children At Risk On CEOP Website!

Security breach found on Ceop website

Back To Releases

11 Apr 11 - 12:03PM |

A web page set up and designed to protect children while they are online has been found to be insecure, it has been reported.

According to reports, a form found on the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) website to report alleged offenders was not encrypted.

Security experts claim that the breach of data could have put children at risk.

Ceop spokesman Peter Davies told the BBC: "The security was not as good as it should have been but it's been fixed now. But to have accessed it you would have had to have really gone hunting for it and would have had to have had very high levels of expertise."

As a result of the breach, there will now be a full investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office. The unencrypted pages meant personal details entered on the site could have been visible to anyone with a sinister motive.

Ceop was set up in 2006 to help find and convict individuals that pose a risk to children, as well as working to keep young people safe while online.

Enhanced and standard disclosure services available at Capita RVS.

Registered office: 71 Victoria Street, Westminister, London SW1H 0XA. Registered in England No. 01396443.

http://www.capitarvs.co.uk/news/news-800494602

Capita Recruitment Vetting Service is registered as an umbrella organisation with the Criminal Records Bureau (England and Wales) and Disclosure Scotland.

@ 2008 The Capita Group Plc. All rights reserved

There's no way Jim Gamble didn't know he was putting victims at risk with the CEOP website, he deliberately exposed their details to every paedo on the planet!!!

Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: Maddie 'died' in apartment, court hears

Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express UK News :: Maddie 'died' in apartment, court hears

Ok this was from the Mccanns' appeal last January (2010), but, TODAY (actually yesterday, even! see photo), The Telegraph (Uk, online) published the same news as if it was only recent... and the headline wasn't particularly in favour of the McCanns (what IS going on in the establishment? ;)) - forum extract (Jill Harvern): Quote:

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id344.html from October 2010.



http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/151405/Maddie-died-in-apartment-court-hearsal (January 2010)

"Now there is this article, from today, The Telegraph (Monday 07 March 2011 -it was also published yesterday):


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/portugal/6974917/Madeleine-McCanns-death-covered-up-by-parents-who-faked-kidnap-court-hears.html


-now, there hasn't really been any other court since the court + appeal of last year, has it? so isn't it curious as the Telegraph mentions this as if it was both past and future -if we read it in details- ???

but what is the point of this, it's not as if this paper was frankly unbiased usually, and ever gave a : flower : for Madeleine McCann's justice and truth... So what is it now? U-Turn? disguised error? Something really happened and I missed it? if yes can someone explain, lol? Or are journalists starting to be fed up covering them and their employers have finally, finally realised that they would make more money by presenting the TRUTH?!


Something's the matter with that...."

DATE: SUNDAY 6th March 2011
-re-published with today's date-
-but it's old news... a little book pre-sale arranged publicity?-