Ok this was from the Mccanns' appeal last January (2010), but, TODAY (actually yesterday, even! see photo), The Telegraph (Uk, online) published the same news as if it was only recent... and the headline wasn't particularly in favour of the McCanns (what IS going on in the establishment? ;)) - forum extract (Jill Harvern): Quote:
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id344.html from October 2010.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/151405/Maddie-died-in-apartment-court-hearsal (January 2010)
"Now there is this article, from today, The Telegraph (Monday 07 March 2011 -it was also published yesterday):
-now, there hasn't really been any other court since the court + appeal of last year, has it? so isn't it curious as the Telegraph mentions this as if it was both past and future -if we read it in details- ???
but what is the point of this, it's not as if this paper was frankly unbiased usually, and ever gave a : flower : for Madeleine McCann's justice and truth... So what is it now? U-Turn? disguised error? Something really happened and I missed it? if yes can someone explain, lol? Or are journalists starting to be fed up covering them and their employers have finally, finally realised that they would make more money by presenting the TRUTH?!
Something's the matter with that...."
|DATE: SUNDAY 6th March 2011|
-re-published with today's date-
-but it's old news... a little book pre-sale arranged publicity?-