UK School Caught PAEDOPHILE TEACHER

EDIT:

 All that low-life got is a MERE 12 months imprisonment AND he's banned from working around Children for ONLY 10 years!

Why ten years? Normally people like that would get banned for LIFE from working with Children. Why 12 months jail? Has the police tried to investigate on  the  SOURCE  of  the  MATERIAL PHYSICS TEACHER ANDREW WARD was using?? Tell me, after his healthy 12 months' break in a cosy jail, how can he ever be prevented from buying a laptop and viewing LIVE footages of kids who suffer sex abuse, again? ?

That bastard was also hanging around BEBO! collecting GIRLS' PHOTOS - advice: if you're on social networks, make sure your account is set for strict privacy...

see: http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/districtnews/9646499.Teacher_jailed_for_downloading_thousands_of_child_porn_images/

First article:

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/9602768.Canon_Slade_teacher_admits_child_porn_charge/r/?action=complain&cid=10209526

Canon Slade teacher admits child porn charge

9:00am Wednesday 21st March 2012

A TEACHER has pleaded guilty to taking indecent images of children and storing extreme material on his computer.
Andrew Ward has been suspended from his post at Canon Slade School in Bolton.
Yesterday, he pleaded guilty to six counts of possessing indecent photographs of children, six charges of taking indecent photographs of children and one count of possessing extreme pornography involving animals.
It is understood the images ranged from levels one to five, five being the worst, and the computer had thousands of images and videos stored on it.
Ward, aged 46, was suspended from the Bradshaw school in November after police executed a search warrant at his home.
His computer and storage devices were seized.
The offences occurred between October 24, 2010, and July 1, 2011.
Ward, of Crompton Road, Lostock, has been bailed to an address in Leeds, and will be sentenced at Bolton Crown Court on April 11.
His solicitor, James Towey, made an application for Ward’s name and address not to be published.

But The Bolton News opposed the application, and it was refused.

Parents received a letter yesterday from the school, which said: “We are writing to inform you that a teacher from this school has been charged by Greater Manchester Police for offences regarding the possession of indecent images of children.
“The school is most concerned and saddened by the nature of the allegations.
“We are co-operating fully with the police investigation together with the Bolton local authority and the Diocese of Manchester to support their inquiries.”

A spokesman for the Diocese of Manchester said: “We are shocked by the nature of these crimes.

“The diocese takes all incidents involving the safety and welfare of children very seriously. Any abusive or inappropriate use of the internet by staff employed in CE schools is completely unacceptable, and staff found guilty of such abuse should be subject to the full weight of employment and criminal legislative powers.
Against such a backdrop, individuals should then be held to account for their own behaviours and actions.”

News

Original Comment

"I went to Canon Slade and we all thought this guy was wrong, we called him a paedophile behind his back and even made remarks to other teachers about him. If the staff as CS didnt show the students blatant ignorance, as if we knew nothing then this dangerous man would have been caught sooner. He was suspended once before, for supposedly locking a girl in a stock cupboard, turning off the light and feeling her up. Why was he let back into school? Yes Canon Slade is a good school, but it's because the students are willing to learn (even when their teachers are incapable) but the fact that CS put me and others in danger because they refused to listen and deal with the situation (and embarrassment) makes me sick."

Ladies And Gents, no you're NOT watching The Dafty News right now. As you can read, this has TRULY HAPPENED. That "school" has been warned about that PAEDO way before he finally got caught, as you can read. But as usual, who are Children? Teens? Obviously, "garbage to just ignore".
DO NOT IGNORE YOUR CHILD  or TEEN WHEN HE / SHE TRIES TO TELL YOU SOMETHING.

The PAYNE theories

This is only the start of a longer post. It will get edited after some searching and writing time.

There must be quite a few "Payne theories", one I can recall is not for the faint-hearted. The name David Payne (Dr) in the case is always associated in internet discussions with Dr Gaspars' statement, which implies paedophily talks and gestures having been expressed, according to the statement, by Dr Payne.[click] -More links and info on their way soon.


Howevever for now here is how I could put one "Payne theory" ;) as pre-written by myself as comment to our Friend Sasha's great blogpost Kate McCann book: David Payne pops up again, linked above, at the Little Morsals:

The thing is, even if it was Payne, say he was well placed cause he knew the MCS and Maddy well, and knew at any time where the MCs were, with the kids alone, and he was dressed like the abductor (as the social worker Yvonne Martin noticed on the 4th May morning) ...then Jane TANNER wouldn't have recognised him? Even "from the back", you KNOW when it's a friend you see.
 
So bingo, LOL, Tanner's in it,  for some reason Payne has killed Maddy, in silence ;), transported her (Tanner handling her to him over the window sill), virtually under the nose of Gerald who was distracted by Wilkins: another suspect, new!! NewsFlash! ;) - what for, who knows? Body parts selling? mmmh...


Fiona stayed with Kate, who never budged, no she didn't search like mad like she pretends in her book [TRUTH] , by the way, while, erm, Fiona's husband pretending he's searching makes sure the 'deal' or 'burrying' or whatever is done... Gerry still not smelling a rat...
Meanwhile Gerry and Kate phone their family, having both given enough extra-time to the culprits by waiting a long time (relatively, but every second counts as Kate says!) before the police is called, LOL!

They BOTH lie to their family that there was a forced entry [TRUTH] - once again satisfying the culprits, their mates, heee heeee, eeee...
They CARRY ON LYING saying Gerry even tried the effing shutter FROM THE OUTSIDE, yes, COULD push it right up easily, heeeee heeeee heeeee.... [I'm laughing for real as it's another TRUE FACT] and so on, and so forth.

What a funny little story! I've had a good laugh making it up. I hope you Readers too!

---

POLICE STATEMENT DR DAVID PAYNE (PJ) 4. MAY 2007:




<><> <><> <><> <><> <><>

Volume I, pages 66 - 68 David Payne "That the interviewee made this statement voluntarily. That he has been on holiday in Portugal since April 28th 2007, staying at the Ocean Club, Praia da Luz. That he plans to return to England on May 5th 2007 (Saturday). That he has known Madeleine's parents for around 5 years. That he was on holiday with Madeleine and her parents. That he came with a group. That the group is composed of nine adults and eight children. The adults are: Diane, the interviewee and his wife (children: ***** and ***), Russell and Jane (children: **** and ****), Matthew and Rachael (child: ******), Gerry and Kate (children: Amelie, Sean and Madeleine). That they decided to come to Portugal on a suggestion from the tour operator. That it was the interviewee who booked the trip. Concerning the days spent in Portugal, the interviewee describes them as being all very much the same. He states that his family, composed of his mother-in-law Diane, his wife Fiona and their two children, spent their days more independently than other members of the group. They were most often with the couple Russell and Jane. Concerning the remaining members of the group, normally they met them in the morning and went for breakfast together at the "Millennium" restaurant, after which they left their children at the Kids Club and the adults went to do sports inside the tourist complex or they went to the beach. The couple Gerry and Kate usually had breakfast in the apartment. It was also usual to have dinner together every night. With the exception of Saturday, when they all dined at the "Millennium" restaurant, every evening the group met at the "Tapas" restaurant at around 8.45 for dinner. While the adults were dining, the children were sleeping in their respective apartments. In answer to our question, the interviewee states that during all the meals, he never went to his apartment or to any of the group's apartments, because he has an "intercom" and the signal carries from the apartment to the restaurant. The other members of the group went, randomly, every 20 minutes, to their apartments to make sure their respective children were asleep. Concerning yesterday evening, he states that he, his wife and his mother-in-law arrived at the restaurant at around 8.55pm. According to what he remembers, when they arrived, all the members of the group were present, apart from the children, who were in bed in their respective rooms. During the evening, Gerry, Jane and Matthew went, alternately, to their children's bedrooms to check if they were sleeping. He thinks they physically went into the apartments. He no longer remembers in what order they went see their children. Towards 10pm, Kate went to her apartment, and less than 5 minutes later, she came back to the restaurant, breaking down, reporting that Madeleine was not in the bedroom. Then everybody went to the apartment occupied by Madeleine's family. He remembers comments concerning the fact that the window and the shutters to Madeleine's bedroom were open, while they had remained closed throughout the week. That the apartment occupied by Madeleine's family comprises two bedrooms, a small kitchen, a lounge and a bathroom. That the lounge has a door which gives outside access in the direction of the restaurant. He does not recall any more details of the apartment but he remembers that the bedroom occupied by the children has a window that looks onto the car park that accesses the main road. That he never went into the said bedroom but he could see that there were two beds and two cots. The cots were placed in the middle of the bedroom. One of the beds was placed against the window and the other, the one occupied by Madeleine, was against the wall facing the one which has a window. In answer to our question, the interviewee doesn't know how many times Madeleine left the tourist complex, but he knows she went, at least once, to the beach. That during the holiday, he saw nothing abnormal concerning the couple Gerry and Kate, neither with their children nor, notably, with Madeleine. In the context of the group, nothing out of the ordinary happened, either. That during the whole holiday, and particularly during the day and the night yesterday, nothing unusual happened in the tourist complex, which attracted his attention, or which could be correlated with Madeleine's disappearance. He describes Madeleine as being a communicative girl, happy, obedient and very well behaved. Madeleine's parents are very sociable people, known by lots of people, kind and affectionate. Madeleine is the daughter of both elements of the couple. She was very wanted and is the result of "In Vitro" fertilisation. There was no difference in treatment between Madeleine and the twins. He doesn't know if Madeleine suffers from any illness, nor if she is on medication. He has nothing more to say that could help the progress of the investigation."

A possibility I've been thinking of :
-PAYNE STATEMENT PJ 4th May: he claims he NEVER went to HIS flat due to the Baby Monitoring device...

- he claims he was ALWAYS therefore at that Tapas' bar.

-apparently he claims he never went even to the 5a "for a slash" ;) - yet Gerry not Kate claims he was the one visiting Maddy on the Wednesday night... which is contradictory as only Gerry says this adding "I think"...

...why didn't he mention this if was true... or did Gerry want to give some false impression, like Kate does all along her book?

NOW: Since Payne had the Baby Monitor , and they all "SAW" that it was SO easy for him and Fi, don't you think they would have arranged for all the kids to stay at the PAYNES'  flat, perhaps making turns to sleep there as couples, to allow the others a good night out?

(NOTE: if the case, none of them said it... so why hide it... to facilitate an abduction story easily from the very open and reachable 5a flat?)

It would explain other things:

-USING THE 5A as a toilet-station (as Kate mentions in her book)

-the DIFFICULTY -even impossibility- to provide anything with Maddy's DNA (were the kids given clothes and shoes, towels, toothbrushes and all regardless of appartenance?) - only a towel was provided to PJ... why not sweaty sandals etc...?

All the kids would be at the Paynes'. The NOTE to the receptionist would be just an excuse to be at the Tapas everynight instead of elewhere, using the late creche.

The CHAPLINS.... Kate and G would be there when it's not their turn to be at the Paynes' with all the kids.

All would pretend that the McCanns' children were at the 5a, precisely also to hide them better, knowing that the 5a is to exposed. And that's why they never bothered locking the door.

Now all the tapas lied with them because, simple, they were already in the lie. Maddy died at 5a because it was BEFORE her sleeping time. As said for the twins, who were getting to bed later and later each day during the following summer (book) Maddy's sleeping time must have been more between 8:30 - as usual for kids that age- and 9 pm...

She died at that time, 8:30 to 9 pm, that's why no forensics results were found in Payne's flat.

"the night we found her." (see You Tube, Gerry's slip-up, Antenna3 tv)

if Gerry said this on purpose it's to hint at an accident. Both to me they don't sound like killers, liars, bad actors yeah, greedy and fashionable, snobs yes, but somehow not killers... I can be wrong, perhaps it WAS pre-planned, orchestrated, then .... etc etc, was the dna planted? quite risky... was the kid hidden for a future sequence of the plan? Maddy found... £££££

-this can include the "other embryo"... 2 stones unturned at once!

if they found her dead, say on the floor, where were they returning from , say at 8:30, 9 pm?

Imo, they didn't. They were THERE. They were IN when she died! Therefore the accident theory is NUL! cause then, why lie? They only had to call an ambulance! they could be just next room and kid falling from top of settee, what's then the need to lie? by the way what were the chances? nothing was unsafe in the flat, while the kids were supervised...

Note: I get the 9 pm bit from http://thelostmarketingploy.blogspot.com/2011/05/dna-issues.html

now I must look for the BLACK BAG WITNESS (click)

_____________________

Please feel free to post your own theories or/and any other comment or link in the provided space below.

"MADELEINE" book by mother Kate

Hi All. As you may know the book is titled  madeleine  ,yes, without a capital M.

Madeleine    by kate mccann  then, see if she likes it this way around? From now on I will always type kate mccann or more exactly kate healy without capitals.

So what does today bring on the media frontline in the Maddy Case department? WOW. Woh-Awww! The Sun newspaper is publishing a full extract of that book. It doesn't say if the sheetroll starts the same way, abruptly and yes, oh forgive me, but it's my feeling emanating from it, totally EMOTIONLESS!

What a flat description of the events of that -now famous- 3rd May 2007 night. I do not feel a scream of dispair, I can't picture it in my head because it is not there. It's a repeat of the tv documentary, it's like reading its transcript, like a list of events, with only a few 'oh gods' added, and kate's heart lurched:

"
All was silent. Then I noticed that the door to the children's bedroom was open quite wide, not how we had left it.
I walked over and gently began to pull it to. Suddenly it slammed shut, as if caught by a draught.
A little surprised, I turned to see if I'd left the patio doors open and let in the breeze. Retracing my steps, I confirmed that I hadn't.
Returning to the children's room, I opened the door a little, and as I did so glanced at Madeleine's bed.
I couldn't quite make her out in the dark. I remember looking at it and looking at it for what was probably only a few seconds, though it felt like much longer.

Brave ... Gerry and Kate McCann have told how they felt guilty after daughter Madeleine's disappearance

Dan Charity - The Sun

It seems so daft now, but I didn't switch on the light straight away. Force of habit, I suppose: taking care to avoid waking the children at all costs.
When I realised Madeleine wasn't actually there, I went through to our bedroom to see if she'd got into our bed. That would explain the open door.
On the discovery of another empty bed, the first wave of panic hit me. As I ran back into the children's room the closed curtains flew up in a gust of wind.

My heart lurched as I saw now that, behind them, the window was wide open and the shutters on the outside raised all the way up. Nausea, terror, disbelief, fear. Icy fear. Dear God, no! Please, no!
On Madeleine's bed, the top right-hand corners of the covers were still turned over forming a neat triangle. Cuddle cat and her pink princess blanket were lying where they'd been when we kissed her goodnight
I dashed over to the second bed, on the other side of the travel cots, where the twins slept on, oblivious, and looked out through the window. I've no idea what I expected to see there. Refusing to acknowledge what I already knew, and perhaps automatically going into a well-practised medical emergency mode, I quickly scoured the apartment to exclude all other possibilities, mentally ticking boxes I knew, deep down, were already ticked. "


Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3567599/MADDIE-MUM-MY-TORTURE-Madeleine-McCanns-mum-Kate-reveals-paedophile-fears-in-new-book-in-The-Sun.html#ixzz1LgdhcLol

Did you just see that? the link ends with... Lol!


Oh please God let me gather my serious back. Right, this will be the copyrights sorted. This is extracted as you can see from a public link which anyone can click to arrive onto a public site. Right right, copyright, Ok. For the rest you may want to spend 60 p and read it for yourself... I will NOT scan-and-publish the rest of the book extract, of course, by the way I have no interest in even reading it. My cat has been sleeping on it since i put it away after reading a few sentences, this was enough for me. I bought the paper to get an idea and I have it now. I feel like bringing it back to get a refund BUT there is something very interesting, or even a few things, yay, see further down regarding the Coloboma.

But hang on, I will start with the public stuff that is free on the Net:

-same link as above-

"Madeleine McCann's mother Kate reveals paedophile fears in new
book in The Sun

By ANTONELLA LAZZERI and OLIVER HARVEY

Published: Today

Add a comment (40)

MADELEINE McCann's mother has told for the first time of terrible visions that her kidnapped daughter is being abused by a pervert.

In a heart-rending book serialised from today in The Sun, Kate, 43, writes how she is haunted by "flashes" of Madeleine "screaming" for her and husband Gerry.
The couple also tell The Sun exclusively about being at the centre of one of the most harrowing stories of modern times.
Kate says four years after her three-year-old was snatched on a family holiday in Portugal: "The idea that my Madeleine was taken by a paedophile is my worst fear.
"I became consumed with it. It was torture for me. It was horrible, so vivid.
"It's worse when I go to bed and think about that first awful night again, when Madeleine went missing.
"That sense of dark and fear, of being desperate to sleep but not being able to. I just end up plummeting down again."
The emotion-charged book by ex-GP Kate is titled simply Madeleine.
She and consultant cardiologist Gerry, 42, admit they are plagued by guilt over the night Madeleine vanished from their holiday apartment in Praia da Luz while they enjoyed a meal with friends at a tapas bar.
Kate says: "If your child is killed in a traffic accident, or died of cancer, parents are at peace. But Madeleine is still missing and she needs us to do something."

"
Are they really? I know a few people whose Child has died and I am sure that they will NOT appreciate such garbage said about their own feelings. That was VERY hurtful Ms Healy, very, and not "helpful" at all for some parents out there who despite their own loss had showed the compassion to still support you. But anyway...Mirror Mirror am I still The Most Beautiful?

So here we have a mother who claims is consumed by grief. Hot stuff for papers. The truth in the case would be hotter to get though, and this would bring more money.

Consumed... The Sun newspaper -paper edition- says today 7th May 2011 on its front cover:

THE BOOK:

Horrific visions of her sex-abuse:Pages 6and7

Hang on, since when is the PAEDOPHILY subject considered as suitable topic for Children to see? Don't kids go to shops? Don't they read the papers that are left on the home tables and chairs? But that's OK cause the McCanns said it. Mind you, their friends and supporters go insult you on the forums and delete you if you ever dare even mentioning the Payne-Gaspars issue. And the McCanns censore books and all, and sue for money. I feel like suing them. Seriously. Since 2007 they brainwash MY kids with their 'PAEDOPHILE' words! At 7 my boy, who was watching tv in the family room on a Saturday afternoon, asked his bigger sister to help him with a search on the dictionary. They were looking for the word... "paedophile" since they had just heard the McCanns say it on tv! Two kids of 7 and 9 years old looking for THAT word on a dictionary! "THANKS" MCCANNS BUT DO YOU KNOW? YOU MAKE ME WISH I LIVED ON AN ISLAND CUT OFF FROM ALL MEDIA, WIRES, TVS, NEWSPAPERS SHOPS AND RADIOS.

By the way what the HELL is THAT?:  " I could see her in bed, looking at me, saying: "Lie with me, mummy, lie with me "

"The images I had of our Madeleine no sane person would want in their head"

~~~

Kate: "People say: "Why didn't you get a babysitter?"
"That didn't enter our minds either. Having a babysitter implied there was a risk situation and we just didn't see it like that.
"We didn't think it was necessary. It wasn't to save money."

Wow.
Wow!
But I'm letting Others ponder on that one. Back to the book extract now:

"
All was silent. Then I noticed that the door to the children's bedroom was open quite wide, not how we had left it.
I walked over and gently began to pull it to. Suddenly it slammed shut, as if caught by a draught.
A little surprised, I turned to see if I'd left the patio doors open and let in the breeze. Retracing my steps, I confirmed that I hadn't.
Returning to the children's room, I opened the door a little, and as I did so glanced at Madeleine's bed.
I couldn't quite make her out in the dark. I remember looking at it and looking at it for what was probably only a few seconds, though it felt like much longer.My heart lurched as I saw now that, behind them, the window was wide open and the shutters on the outside raised all the way up. Nausea, terror, disbelief, fear. Icy fear. Dear God, no! Please, no!
On Madeleine's bed, the top right-hand corners of the covers were still turned over forming a neat triangle. Cuddle cat and her pink princess blanket were lying where they'd been when we kissed her goodnight
I dashed over to the second bed, on the other side of the travel cots, where the twins slept on, oblivious, and looked out through the window. I've no idea what I expected to see there. Refusing to acknowledge what I already knew, and perhaps automatically going into a well-practised medical emergency mode, I quickly scoured the apartment to exclude all other possibilities, mentally ticking boxes I knew, deep down, were already ticked."

And of course even in today's Sun paper edition there is a display of 
TWO DIFFERENT COLOBOMAS,
(it's the dash in Maddy's right eye, in the iris.) But... That CANNOT CHANGE! It's a medical FACT, "a coloboma doesn't change thoughout life."  A professor in ophtalmology wrote this fact to me.
Let's see:

The Sun UK newspaper 7th May 2011 - paper edition

Coloboma at 7 o'clock

Coloboma at 6 o'clock

see The Sun 7th May 2011's front cover vs. page 9
-paper edition-


_________

Thank You for reading and following our Free Blog.
Special Thanks to our Followers who comment and share.

~~~
Open for Comments, Welcome to All!

Jim Gamble Put Children At Risk On CEOP Website!

Security breach found on Ceop website

Back To Releases

11 Apr 11 - 12:03PM |

A web page set up and designed to protect children while they are online has been found to be insecure, it has been reported.

According to reports, a form found on the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) website to report alleged offenders was not encrypted.

Security experts claim that the breach of data could have put children at risk.

Ceop spokesman Peter Davies told the BBC: "The security was not as good as it should have been but it's been fixed now. But to have accessed it you would have had to have really gone hunting for it and would have had to have had very high levels of expertise."

As a result of the breach, there will now be a full investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office. The unencrypted pages meant personal details entered on the site could have been visible to anyone with a sinister motive.

Ceop was set up in 2006 to help find and convict individuals that pose a risk to children, as well as working to keep young people safe while online.

Enhanced and standard disclosure services available at Capita RVS.

Registered office: 71 Victoria Street, Westminister, London SW1H 0XA. Registered in England No. 01396443.

http://www.capitarvs.co.uk/news/news-800494602

Capita Recruitment Vetting Service is registered as an umbrella organisation with the Criminal Records Bureau (England and Wales) and Disclosure Scotland.

@ 2008 The Capita Group Plc. All rights reserved

There's no way Jim Gamble didn't know he was putting victims at risk with the CEOP website, he deliberately exposed their details to every paedo on the planet!!!