UK School Caught PAEDOPHILE TEACHER

EDIT:

 All that low-life got is a MERE 12 months imprisonment AND he's banned from working around Children for ONLY 10 years!

Why ten years? Normally people like that would get banned for LIFE from working with Children. Why 12 months jail? Has the police tried to investigate on  the  SOURCE  of  the  MATERIAL PHYSICS TEACHER ANDREW WARD was using?? Tell me, after his healthy 12 months' break in a cosy jail, how can he ever be prevented from buying a laptop and viewing LIVE footages of kids who suffer sex abuse, again? ?

That bastard was also hanging around BEBO! collecting GIRLS' PHOTOS - advice: if you're on social networks, make sure your account is set for strict privacy...

see: http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/districtnews/9646499.Teacher_jailed_for_downloading_thousands_of_child_porn_images/

First article:

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/9602768.Canon_Slade_teacher_admits_child_porn_charge/r/?action=complain&cid=10209526

Canon Slade teacher admits child porn charge

9:00am Wednesday 21st March 2012

A TEACHER has pleaded guilty to taking indecent images of children and storing extreme material on his computer.
Andrew Ward has been suspended from his post at Canon Slade School in Bolton.
Yesterday, he pleaded guilty to six counts of possessing indecent photographs of children, six charges of taking indecent photographs of children and one count of possessing extreme pornography involving animals.
It is understood the images ranged from levels one to five, five being the worst, and the computer had thousands of images and videos stored on it.
Ward, aged 46, was suspended from the Bradshaw school in November after police executed a search warrant at his home.
His computer and storage devices were seized.
The offences occurred between October 24, 2010, and July 1, 2011.
Ward, of Crompton Road, Lostock, has been bailed to an address in Leeds, and will be sentenced at Bolton Crown Court on April 11.
His solicitor, James Towey, made an application for Ward’s name and address not to be published.

But The Bolton News opposed the application, and it was refused.

Parents received a letter yesterday from the school, which said: “We are writing to inform you that a teacher from this school has been charged by Greater Manchester Police for offences regarding the possession of indecent images of children.
“The school is most concerned and saddened by the nature of the allegations.
“We are co-operating fully with the police investigation together with the Bolton local authority and the Diocese of Manchester to support their inquiries.”

A spokesman for the Diocese of Manchester said: “We are shocked by the nature of these crimes.

“The diocese takes all incidents involving the safety and welfare of children very seriously. Any abusive or inappropriate use of the internet by staff employed in CE schools is completely unacceptable, and staff found guilty of such abuse should be subject to the full weight of employment and criminal legislative powers.
Against such a backdrop, individuals should then be held to account for their own behaviours and actions.”

News

Original Comment

"I went to Canon Slade and we all thought this guy was wrong, we called him a paedophile behind his back and even made remarks to other teachers about him. If the staff as CS didnt show the students blatant ignorance, as if we knew nothing then this dangerous man would have been caught sooner. He was suspended once before, for supposedly locking a girl in a stock cupboard, turning off the light and feeling her up. Why was he let back into school? Yes Canon Slade is a good school, but it's because the students are willing to learn (even when their teachers are incapable) but the fact that CS put me and others in danger because they refused to listen and deal with the situation (and embarrassment) makes me sick."

Ladies And Gents, no you're NOT watching The Dafty News right now. As you can read, this has TRULY HAPPENED. That "school" has been warned about that PAEDO way before he finally got caught, as you can read. But as usual, who are Children? Teens? Obviously, "garbage to just ignore".
DO NOT IGNORE YOUR CHILD  or TEEN WHEN HE / SHE TRIES TO TELL YOU SOMETHING.

"Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap' "By The Telegraph Online UK Press

"Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears

Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.

“She died in the apartment as a result of a tragic accident and the parents simulated an abduction after failing to care of their children,” Tavares de Almeida, former chief inspector at Portimao police station during the initial months of the investigation, told the court in Lisbon.

 

“These were the conclusions of a police report signed by me on September 10 2007,” he added."

Source: The Telegraph, mainstream UK Press (online)
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/portugal/6974917/Madeleine-McCanns-death-covered-up-by-parents-who-faked-kidnap-court-hears.html
 
Since this old news article was published TWICE in a row, well over ONE YEAR LATER,  yesterday and today (please see post below), I might as well make TWO posts about it. It is THEIR headlines I am only reproducing. I have no idea why this huge media is choosing to repost these news, that were sensational, and some would say, "not very helpful to find Madeleine", when no related event but a book on pre-sale is really happening. But this must be coincidence.
Has any marketing ploy become part of a huger marketing plan, by any chance? Or are there some concerned people out there, concerned that a case for a child is archived, with no indication that her investigation would have any good reason to get archived in the first place? The curious matter is left to anyone's guess. We can still write to the media and ask... perhaps we would get lucky enough not to receive a stereotyped letter back in our faces.
 
It reminds me that, back in 2007, I had had ENOUGH of these media that were (almost all) saying that "Madeleine McCann has been abducted, snatched from her bed in Praia Da Luz", so I massively emailed all these to ask which proof exactly they had to state this. Since they had none, it could only be disinformation - and WHY? Why do disinformation in a little child's case? was my big question to them.
I also chose to write about my incentive around a few public forums and comments spaces. Better not leave these efforts in secrecy... I think that many others joined me in the action, because a little while later, we saw some changes in the general press statements. Maddy wasn't abducted any longer. She was MISSING, difference. Only some media (the type of cheap sheetroll, with a strong odour of racism and taste of ...) were still obstinate into forcing the abduction on. Some jumped from the ditch to the fence, it was an in-between: Maddy was feared abducted. Fair enough, it's very scary to have the thought of any (of YOUR) child abducted.
Some supra-intelligent people with sheer powers like Mrs Justice HOGG were, in a vindictive passion, ordering "the abductor" to come and fall onto their knees in front of her, and confess. She PONDERED that the McCanns were "RESPONSIBLE" parents. I do not know where Mrs HOGG got her child-care diplomas from, do they sometimes come as a bonus gift with tins of sardines? Because, Mrs HOGG, you see, I never knew that an attitude like this of the McCanns in matter of parenting, can EVER be considered as responsible.
 
So Ok, according to you, Mrs Justice HOGG, they WERE responsible, and Madeleine WAS abducted. She became your "child of Justice" with a WOC. Had you meant a WACK in the poor child's face, you would have done even better, because where are you now? What do you do for Madeleine, exactly? Are you aware of the seriousness, heaviness of HER situation? They were responsible, doing organised child neglect, she was abducted, because they were so responsible, it makes great sense. Your protected parent (the female of them) was writing a diary, where she stated a few things that surely would catch your attention, like the mentioning of paedophiles that want to make HER tear her OWN skin off, but after this, Mrs HOGG, did you see the sort of photos that they were publicly posting? Feared abducted, Madeleine McCann, three years old, WACKED with MAKE-UP. Is this wise you think, for a potential paedophile raptor?
Child-care, you said? Of which kind, may I ask?

So, Mrs Hogg, Mr Cameron, Mr Brown, Mr Blair, Mr Mitchell, Mr Kennedy, Mr Murdoch, Mr Magalhaes e Menezes, now you can all tell us: where is the case for this Little Child, MADELEINE MCCANN, going?
 Do you have a conscience? If not, as we suspect, at least you do have a job the RESPONSIBILITIES of which you have to fulfill.
A PUBLIC job means PUBLIC DUTIES, before private profits.
Or BE more honest: what is the wider agenda? Any thought for the TRUTH and the JUSTICE for this little person? Start by doing what you're best at: your JOB, by the basics, instead of taking the money and laughing your face off Madeleine. Try JUSTICE if you do justice. Try CARE if you really care. And try reporting on the TRUTH if you own newspapers. But STOP messing us all around like that, because we seriously are saturated with your putrefied food, it leaves a bitter taste in our mouths. And some spirits above are getting REALLY over agitated.