Some snippets are worth gold - or Gauld ;)

Hi All. I like surfing around the net to still discover comments or Posts that trigger a "Oh My Gawd!" inside me. Here's this one for example, from "Christobell"*:

[He/ She was mentioning Kate "McCann"'s book, dubbed "The bewk"]

"I have not read the bewk yet, other than the newspaper serial, and the clips I have seen online, and, I think it was Blacksmith who said, it is the longest confession in history, or something like that. I have a feeling it wil become iconic, but for all the wrong reasons, from a TM [team McCann] perspective that is, but a great help to forensic psychology students! Digressing slightly, in my mind, this feels like car crash tv, but in very slow motion. I am convinced that the Mccanns do actually believe their own publicity, it is as if they have lost all sense of reality in their quest for, hmm, I'm stumped, their quest for what?"

*Source: http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3685p210-kate-mccann-named-one-of-the-20-most-inspirational-women-in-britain#92488

Kate McCann named one of the 20 most inspirational women in Britain

("Lol" @ "Inspirational" - this can be perceived in many ways...)

_______  Excellent! Ty. I love the image of a car crash diluted in many chapters by a woman who is supposed to be absolutely traumatised by a huge event - event that, before the book, she herself has broken down in many snippets and episodes. Kate's life... Kate's sexual media mania... Many of us have been through harsh, cruel, unfair and hurtful events in our life course, it is, when the case, difficult enough to talk about it, let alone considering talking to the press about it, and as to envisage [=FACE] the "opportunity" of making, writing a BOOK about this, well most People will be 'with me', we just prefer to deal with this privately, and even more than privately: personally, inside us, we actually rarely mention this, because simply it is a matter of an internal pain that gets healed over time, in various ways - enough said.

Now I seriously often WONDER, in the instance of a Mother who claims and likes to shout from every top roof [;)rooftop] she can find, that her beloved Daughter was abducted, in 2007, that is about 4 years ONLY before she published the book - and if we consider the fact that writing isn't easy for any amateur, it would bring the decision of this 'plunge' a while precedent- HOW, oh HOW could this Mother POSSIBLY stay static behind her writing pc desk, typing ALL these HORRID, CRUCIFYINGLY PAINFUL MEMORIES in the wide calm and requirements of logics and organisation that any book DEMANDS for its completion?

Ladies and Gents', I like Kate have Children and our whole Lives to care for, plan, pre-organise and then live, day by day; this includes a lot of activities as I also need to include my career into it, and by the way it is not as I have it easy, and I am about the same age as Kate. My Aunt calls us the "energetic 40's", because obviously she is older than a '40', but her own parameters were greatly different then when she was a '40'. Now, why am I including all these details? Because since last summer, precisely July 2011, I have started writing a Book. My book is not about an excuciating life experience: no! I couldn't do this. My own book is of a Sci-Fy genre, and it's still mostly in manuscript formats - I find it hard to find 2 days in a row to continue it. Anyway: as I wrote a bit above, yes of course I could, if I wanted to, write a PERSONAL book ON my own "life story" - not that I call deep events in my life, which include Other People's Lives, a "story".
Simply, to sum this up, still now, after years (decades actually), I would find it VERY difficult, and even to the point of getting 'self-inflicting', to write any book about this 'life story'.


However, Kate has given me the impression of BULGING to write her book. Amaral wrote his, yet many elements in Kate's book appear as a response to many people, including Mr Amaral. It's a book with a Revenge, also as I perceived it an attempt to "explain" and possibly to "put Britain Ladies in her pocket" - not to say a bit of "whitewash", because where are the PARAMOUNT parts to this case (let's remember this clearly for the author: HER DAUGHTER!) such as : Mr And Mrs GASPAR, Mr DAVID PAYNE, the CADAVER ODOUR on her own CLOTHES [Kate's], the SEMEN STAIN on a CHILD of HER's BED [bedding!in Praia Da Luz, 5a holiday flat!] and other 'UNimportant' elements like her own Family and Social Circle's LIES regarding the WINDOWS and the SHUTTER in MADELEINE's holiday BEDROOM.

Yes! ALL this!!!!

Now - again- these omissions are really important in the eye of a Child Case psychologist -these entries and these lacks of entries. Like we could easily all get to know Kate in between the lines as she luridly describes "The Tunnel", a 'vision' she attributes to her husband/love partner Gerry in the Nossa Signora Church in Luz, when this couple had the intimate pass to this sacred premise to themselves in private, we can also ask a Doctor in Psychology: Why does Kate associate SEX with Gerry in their Rothley bed with VISIONS/THOUGHTS of a PAEDOPHILE NATURE? - Read the book, or search this blog. It's all 'black upon white', it's there, here, we have a clear association of a Child going to 'sandwich' herself at night hours between her Parents - yes, that's common, Kids get scared at night and mostly look for 'Mamah', and we all end up sleeping in narrow fringes of the bed, or we are steaming 'in the middle', then we get up and finish the night on the settee downstairs, or anyway as we can. YET look at this paragraph. NEXT Kate is thinking of what? Well.. a PAEDO.

Again, I find this association of thoughts really disturbing. Since SY or NSY (New Scotland Yard) are looking int this CASE right now, I am demanding from them that they should logically refer to psychologists, - and REQUIRE PSYCHOLOGY -field study of this case at all levels- once more I am not writing this lightly, again read this blog and you will see that I have conducted numerous 'workshops' in this subject: Madeleine McCann Case, hence I know that standard psychological in depth study/ies is/are needed herein.

Kate's Corpses Argument DEBUNKED.

Remember what Kate Healy apparently said to the Press to refute the cadaver odour which was detected by police sniffer dogs on HER OWN CLOTHES in the summer 2007?

According to The Sun, Kate Healy stated that due to her work, she had been in contact with several dead bodies as a locum doctor, hence the smell of death all around these places - and her OWN clothes. [see link, from The Sun:

"The dogs also sniffed items of clothing — and the film shows Eddie again picking up a scent on some of Kate's.
The family GP [= Kate] has insisted she came into contact with at least SIX dead bodies before going on holiday with her husband and three children."


Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/maddie/1651651/Kate-and-Gerry-McCann-wrongly-named-as-suspects-over-Maddie-disappearance-by-Portuguese-police-after-sniffer-dog-evidence.html#ixzz1j066kD8A


However, now I am wondering how could she come up with such pretense while being highly trained in biology and medecine, had she said this herself? Surely she should have checked a thing or two before she made her assertion. How RIDICULOUS this sounds, for anyone who searches a little bit in Forensics Science, and finds that she would have had to stay in contact with these CORPSES for 90 MINUTES for the odour to impregnate her clothes so strongly that it could be detected by a trained EVRD (CADAVER) dog!!!!!

( Beside, it seems that in her book there is no mention of this,  no more than of the odour on her clothes -fact that is yet a crucial element in the case. It gets me to wonder, why mention this to The Sun, but not in the book "madeleine"[sic], and why not even a paragraph on this cadaver odour? Kate gave me the impression that she was pretty much relieved after Gerry, her husband, pondered like a hard, final, conclusive decision that all the dogs' findings were 'worth nothing' as it's "no exact science". She as well as him NEVER questioned these facts in the way that it could be linked to their daughter's fate, why was this? Anger and immediate 'pondering' rushed to replace, as it seems to me, any question in their mind. It CAN'T be cadaver odour, the dogs LIE, they're garbage and beside, LOL, they had never been in Portugal before! I truly laughed at reading this part.
Here is Yan's demonstration:

"Some thoughts also on the tests done which indicate that it takes 90mins for contamination to occur.
The tests are based on exposure times alone, ie the length of time a piece of material was exposed to a body / cadaver.
The cloth exposed for a 90 min period resulted in the most detection.
The suggestion is when a body is decomposing it take 90 minutes before contaminating anything.

In fact this test totally contradicts the knowledge that contamination is instant. What it does in effect is suggest that something has to have been in contact with a body / cadaver for 90 mins before becoming contaminated enough for the dogs to accurately detect anything.
ie - If you look at the suggestion that KM as part of her work came into contact with dead bodies, this would mean she would have had to have spent 90 mins in very close proximity to one before becoming contaminated. "

An Intriguing Revelation

9pm! What happened?

 KATE MCCANN SLIPPED UP TWICE THE SAME WAY, FOUR YEARS AGO and RECENTLY!:

[written in May 2011]

• 4 years ago to social worker Yvonne Martin: at 10 am on the 4th May she told her that Maddy was missing for 13 hours.
• Recently on RTE The Late Late Show she said that when the PJ arrived to the 5a apartment, Maddy had been missing for 4 hours. On her book she states that they arrived at 1 am on the 4th May.

Conclusion:
She twice said that Maddy went "missing" at 9 pm on the 3rd May...,  so WHAT exactly HAPPENED at 9 o'clock? Gerry stated he was checking on their own 3 children at exactly 9:05 pm, stating that Maddy was fine etc... What is the truth? If Madeleine was already missing at 21:00, why fabricate the 22:00 story?!
~~~
Back to Fantasy Land blogpost: click here.


RTE LATE LATE SHOW May 2011 Link:
http://www.rte.ie/player/#v=1098327




The presenter asked Gerry in the end "Is she still alive Gerry?"

________________________________________________________________________________

What questions must the McCanns' forthcoming book answer? - A chance for us all to ask the McCanns to clear up lots of unanswered questions

What questions must the McCanns' forthcoming book answer? - A chance for us all to ask the McCanns to clear up lots of unanswered questions

Click on this title to read an excellent thread by Tony Bennett on the Jill Harvern Forum, and why not join and ask your own questions?

I particularly love this one, as I have shared this for a long time, it's about a typically GUILTY attitude:


-by Get 'em Gonçalo on Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:23 pm-

"Why did the McCann's make excuses for the cadaver scent and blood by saying it could be from rotting meat and dirty nappies. Why did they not DEMAND to know whose dead body this blood and scent belonged to?"

_______________________________________________
Get 'em Gonçalo - http://goncaloamaraltruthofthelie.blogspot.com/

_____________________________________________________________

My own question (Megafundline's) is about Madeleine's Health Records: why did her parents refuse to show them to the inspectors? What did they fear, what is there to hide in these?
Also, I didn't know that parents of a missing child can afford the right not to give child-related documents. In my views and I think, according to the law, this is a must, it has no choice in accepting/ refusing.
I've always heard as police being able to obtain documents or else via WARRANTS.
Why are the McCanns not answerable to the law?
What is it that makes them "Special" and ABOVE THE LAW??

(and same question for their child neglect practice).

Human blood + cadaver odour found by the police here:

AND in many other places of the holiday flat...

AND in the parents' rented car boot.