Sunday, 27 February 2011


"Furthermore, a strong marking of cadaver odour was made on Kate McCann’s clothes, which may indicate that she was in touch with the cadaver.

There was also a strong marking of cadaver odour in the car that was used by the McCann couple after 27 May 2007). Taking together the blood dog’s marking, and based on the forensics that are included in the process files, which indicate the presence of Madeleine McCann’s DNA in the car boot, we cannot exclude a strong hypothesis that this vehicle may have possibly been used move the cadaver, 24 days or more after Madeleine’s death.
The indication from the cadaver dog, as well as from the blood detection dog, on the key of the aforementioned vehicle, where the laboratory would confirm the existence of Dr Gerald McCann’s DNA, cannot be dismissed. This last signalling was obtained by the dogs after the key was put far away from the vehicle, in a non-visible location.


From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:

A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007

B. a simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place

C. in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted

D. Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann

E. at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident, yet;

F. from what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.

G. Therefore, we suggest that the case files are sent to the Republic’s Prosecutor, in the Lagos legal district, for:

1) possible new questioning of the arguidos Dr Gerald and Dr Kate McCann, and

2) an evaluation of the measure of restraint to be applied in this case.

During the house search at the McCann couple’s residence, a diary style manuscript was found, already photocopied, possibly authored by Dr Kate McCann; admitting that it may contain information that may help to reach the material truth of facts.

We therefore propose that the photocopies of the said document are presented to the illustrious judge for the purpose of its apprehension (if legal), its translation and eventual collection of information to be included in the files, as necessary for the investigation.

At this date, I submit the case files for your appreciation, for you to determine whatever you may see as convenient.

10 September 2007
Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida."


  1. That's a very logically put report by Taveres De Almeida, it just seems incedable that this report wasn't acted upon by the Lord Justice as requested by Almeida?

    One thing though, every time I read the McCann's screaming that the Portugese police planted Madeleine's DNA on them, their apartment, the car, Kate's clothes and Cuddle Cat, etc;, I just laugh my sock's off, cause how would the Portugese police have Madeleine's DNA in the first place to plant it on the McCann's?

  2. Yep Ka, it's good to publicly repeat that they even DARED accusing the POLICE of PLANTING THE EVIDENCE! Then why don't that police act upon the LAW? I'm "sorry" but everything in that report frankly accuses the McCanns, in addition since then, we found out evidence of deliberate sabotage of the investigation BY THEM and by their friends at the BRITISH GOVERNMENT, who ordered the British Police to mess with the investigation on their side, (the rogatory interviews were such a JOKE too!), now why doesn't at least Portugal show this up to the rest of the world and demands a RE-INTERVIEW of the McCanns and Cohort? Leading to a TRIAL! Cause that's what these people need, a good trial, full of ERMS and BUTS and "YOU KNOWS", other contradictions and obvious lies, this would surely arrest them for PERJURY, perverting the court of JUSTICE, and nought that the wimp corrupted British chickens could do then! What would they do? say "STOP! YOU CANT ARREST OUR FRIENDS WHO NEGLECTED 3 KIDS NIGHT AFTER NIGHT AND PAID US OFF TO PROTECT THEM!!!" ? No they couldn't, cause ALL the evidence of messing this investigation for a defenseless, voiceless, innocent little Child would then be put into their faces, as well as the SHAME they've caused to themselves, their own kids, the rest of their family, their relations, their electors, their represented Citizens and by extension, ALL the People who live in the UK!

    People should read this reeport and if they haven't got the time to, at least read the CONCLUSION of it. And don't get confused as to who messed with the evidence - from the start, as we discussed privately, I agree that this should be repeated, 5a appartment CONTAMINATION OF EVIDENCE on the 3rd May 07 NIGHT- and as to WHO finds stupid, ridiculous, clickmejollies ALIBIS of effing rotten meat and leaking shrimps, or dirty nappies! DOHS!

  3. Lol, your right, the Mccann's are protected from being criminalised even though they criminalised themselves by deliberately neglecting their children for 6 nights in a row, even AFTER suposedly spotting a pervy paedo taking photos of their kids in a foreign country they still left their kids in an unlocked apartment, so why havn't they been put in front of a public judge and jury for this crime in the first place!

    What I laugh at is Clarence Mitchell's statement that the McCann's made a mistake and are now paying for that mistake, when the fact is one of so much intelligent professionals in the NHS shouldn't be making such mistake's with their children's safety, especially in a foriegn country, and not only did they just make one mistake, they made the same mistake for 6 nights in a row everytime they left their children without adult supervision to run off to the Tapas bar to their NHS Swinging TapHead gang, which seemed to them to be more importent than the safety of their own children, it just beggers belif that the NHS can employ such negligent people that don't really give a flying fuck for their kids which reflects on the attitude of the NHS as a whole as not giving a flying fuck for it's public patients either, as it wasn't just the Mccann's that deliberately neglected their children for a piss up for 6 nights in a row, it was ALL their NHS TapHead gang also, and it's NOT the McCann's paying for their mistake, ie; 6 mistakes in a row every night for a week in a foreign country, it's the bloody public paying for their negligence!

    I wouldn't want the public money to pay for yet another heap of reverse posychology bollocks in reinvestigating the case, fuck the Mccann's and TapHead Crew, just fucking jail the fuckers, the evidence against them plus the fact they all admitted to the PJ and the public press that they neglected their chidlen and left them alone in an unlocked apartment is enough to put them in jail for year's, so the problem lies with the Law, it's full of brainless idiots, not forgetting the fact that the UK police arn't working for the public protection since 2005, they got taken over by the Ministers of Parliaments Private National Police Improvements Agency, protecting paedophiles inside the public services industry, getting paid by the public tax payer and protecting their Freemason Brotherhood of criminals and paedophiles from being prosecuted by the public, so I'ed say, Fuck the police, lets just hang all the Freemason fuckers, McCann's and TapHead Crew included, not forgetting the Nazi BBC, they deserve no better for this pathetic cherade, I owouldn't pay a penny to see this shit on the stage at Stratford!

  4. What was the prosectors final decision?

  5. They (as they were two to make the decision) archived the case!
    Which is making all of us yell.

    Here's more info:

    "Therefore, after all seen, analysed and duly pondered, with all that is left exposed, it is determined:

    a) The archiving of the Process concerning arguido Robert James Queriol Eveleigh Murat, because there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code;

    b) The archiving of the Process concerning arguidos Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Marie Healy, because there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.

    Article 277 number 3 of the Penal Process Code is to be fulfilled.

    Under article 214 number 1 item a) of the Penal Process Code, the coercion measures that have been imposed on the arguidos are declared extinct.

    Portimão, 21.07.08

    The Republic's Prosecutor

    (José de Magalhães e Menezes)

    The Joint General Prosecutor

    (João Melchior Gomes)

    in: Processo 201/07.0 GALGS - Volume XVII - pages 4639-4649 (Public Prosecutor's Archiving Dispatch)"

  6. How on Earth is child neglect not considered as a crime in the first place and contamination of a crime scene, appeal for help from politicians paid by the tax-payers in the UK, not even in Portugal, and whose job dooesn't even comprehend such actions, TO prevent the investigation for their own Child?!

    Clearly when one re-reads this inconclusive conclusion, it gives to think that they archived a CHILD case because they SO-CALLED couldn't find INDICATIONS on her parents, which in fact could be the object of a trial in itself.

    Because, for one, the Child is still officially missing. This has nothing to do with finding 'indications' or not! For two, how many more indications did they need? Aren't lies, contradictions on statements, and forensics not indications, BY DEFINITION?!

    This is a big orchestrated hypocrisy, where the interest of the Child is totally ignored, discarded, laughed at. I come to even wonder of the LEGALITY of that decision.

  7. What if they archived the case cause not only couldn't they find any evidence to prove an abduction had taken place, but what if they also found out that the child never existed in the first place, and the Mccann's had faked a child called Madeleine to divert the British public via the press as a propaganda tactic to conceal much more worse crimes by the Brisih Gvmnt such as they were involved in Operation Ore using their credit cards to view illegal child porn on the House of Parliament computer system... look at Prince Andrew involved with a convicted paedophile business man and American billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, and engaging in business deal's where obviously they could conceal their paedophile tactics inside the deals and traffick illegal porn or even childen as products for their secret paedophile industry, after all, the Mccann's turned their child, if she existed, into a product didn't they!

  8. I suspect that there is one special reason to archive this case and I would love to know which one!!! imo as I heard of a secret pact between PT & GB authorities (a few portuguse people have said this to me) the whole aim is to let the media, the McCann team , the lawyers etc. carry on making money and the deal is to get a share of this, cause what interest would Portugal have to cover British paedophiles, none, unless of course Magalhaes e Meneses is in with it or belongs to a secretive group like the free-masons, as key people in the media and in the McCanns-team lawyers are free-masons.
    Has ANY interview been taking place to actually question that dodgy prosecutor Magalhaes e Meneses in Portugal???? because the WHY question could -perhaps- generate an interesting answer or at least wake a few people up in Portugal - instead of waiting like sheepos until the next president is elected (who will probably be into the same scope of corruption anyway, 'lol')


Thanks for leaving a comment: